發(fā)布時間：2018-01-21 16:01

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 法制理念 立法原則 法制建構(gòu) 自由結(jié)社權(quán) 集體談判權(quán) 罷工權(quán)　出處：《西北工業(yè)大學》2006年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：集體談判是市場經(jīng)濟條件下調(diào)整勞動關(guān)系的主要手段,是市場經(jīng)濟國家勞動關(guān)系制度的核心內(nèi)容。集體談判法制包括集體談判法律體系、集體談判法的理念、創(chuàng)制、適用、遵守和解釋,它對確立、保護和發(fā)展集體談判的作用有重要意義。本文主要從集體談判法律體系、法律意識、法律創(chuàng)制這幾個集體談判法制最為重要的問題入手對建構(gòu)我國集體談判法制進行研究,并提出初步的方案。 我國目前有關(guān)集體談判的立法非常薄弱,集體談判法制還沒有建立起來,這對保護勞動者行使集體談判權(quán)非常不利。本文從三個方面入手對構(gòu)建我國集體談判法制的幾個重要問題作了分析。首先是分析集體談判法制的構(gòu)成。集體談判法制要服務于發(fā)揮集體談判制度的作用,它的基本價值指向是保護勞動者的生存權(quán)和發(fā)展權(quán),為了實現(xiàn)這個價值,它的基本原則應該是:權(quán)利制衡原則、誠信原則、自治原則和禁止權(quán)力濫用原則。國家確立何種方式調(diào)整勞動關(guān)系對建構(gòu)集體談判法制有決定性影響。如果采取協(xié)約自治模式調(diào)整勞動關(guān)系,則通過建構(gòu)集體談判法制保證集體談判制度的運行是必要的。但是如果國家采取統(tǒng)合模式調(diào)整勞動關(guān)系,則從功能上講,集體談判沒有存在的價值,也就談不到建立集體談判法制。通過比較和分析兩種調(diào)整模式,本文提出建立符合中國國情的“有序參與”的調(diào)整模式,為集體談判立法奠定了邏輯前提。有關(guān)集體談判的國際法已經(jīng)比較系統(tǒng),我國對集體談判的立法應該參考國際人權(quán)法框架,履行我國的公約義務,縮小我國法律保護水平與國際人權(quán)法規(guī)范之間的差距。最后,在我國集體談判立法模式的選擇上,綜合分析了集體談判法與我國現(xiàn)有的勞動法在立法原則、調(diào)整的勞動關(guān)系的區(qū)別后,本文認為,集體談判法有自己的獨立性,不能被現(xiàn)行勞動法涵蓋,應該進行單行立法。
[Abstract]:Collective bargaining is the main means to adjust the labor relations under the condition of market economy and the core content of the labor relations system in the market economy countries. The legal system of collective bargaining includes the legal system of collective bargaining and the concept of collective bargaining law. Creation, application, compliance and interpretation are of great significance to the establishment, protection and development of the role of collective bargaining. The most important problems of collective bargaining legal system are established by law. The author studies the construction of collective bargaining legal system in our country and puts forward a preliminary plan. At present, the legislation on collective bargaining in China is very weak, and the legal system of collective bargaining has not yet been established. This is very unfavorable to the protection of workers' right to collective bargaining. This paper analyzes several important problems in the construction of the legal system of collective bargaining in China from three aspects. Firstly, it analyzes the constitution of the legal system of collective bargaining and the constitution of the legal system of collective bargaining. The legal system should serve to play the role of collective bargaining system. Its basic value is to protect workers' right to survival and development, in order to realize this value, its basic principles should be: the principle of balance of rights, the principle of good faith. The principle of autonomy and the principle of prohibiting abuse of power. The way that the state establishes the adjustment of labor relations has a decisive influence on the construction of the legal system of collective bargaining. It is necessary to guarantee the operation of collective bargaining system by constructing the legal system of collective bargaining, but if the state adopts the integration mode to adjust the labor relations, there is no value of collective bargaining in terms of function. Through the comparison and analysis of the two adjustment models, this paper puts forward the adjustment model of "orderly participation" in accordance with the national conditions of China. For collective bargaining legislation laid a logical premise. Collective bargaining in international law has been more systematic, our collective bargaining legislation should refer to the framework of international human rights law, the implementation of our obligations under the Convention. Reduce the gap between the level of legal protection and international human rights law norms. Finally, on the choice of the legislative model of collective bargaining, the author comprehensively analyzes the legislative principles of collective bargaining law and the existing labor law of our country. After adjusting the difference of labor relations, this paper holds that collective bargaining law has its own independence, can not be covered by the current labor law, and should carry out separate legislation.
【學位授予單位】：西北工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D922.5

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 馬靜;集體談判法律制度研究[D];鄭州大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1451924