發(fā)布時間：2018-05-14 21:40

  本文選題：金融 + 檢察制度�。� 參考：《四川省社會科學院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：金融作為現(xiàn)代市場經(jīng)濟的核心體現(xiàn)，已經(jīng)滲透到國家、企業(yè)和人們生活的各個層面，金融安全是整個國家經(jīng)濟安全乃至國家安全的重要組成部分。隨著金融市場不斷向?qū)�業(yè)化、多元化和復(fù)雜化的發(fā)展，金融犯罪問題也隨之增加，由2006年檢察機關(guān)移送起訴4000余件，增長至2010年的12000余件，增長率達到了31%。再之金融領(lǐng)域的新情況、新問題層出不窮，這勢必給檢察機關(guān)參與治理金融犯罪帶來新的挑戰(zhàn)，檢察機關(guān)在面對金融犯罪不斷增長、金融領(lǐng)域?qū)�業(yè)化程度較高的情形說明，按傳統(tǒng)粗放型辦案模式已力不從心。檢察機關(guān)需要調(diào)整工作思路，圍繞金融犯罪理論與實踐問題展開預(yù)防和懲治措施，建立和完善金融檢察機構(gòu)，轉(zhuǎn)向?qū)�業(yè)化、精細化的辦案模式。 本文研究內(nèi)容主要分為五個部分： 第一部分為金融檢察與金融檢察專業(yè)化概述。首先，對金融檢察的概念、特征、性質(zhì)進行闡釋，科學定位檢察監(jiān)督在金融檢察體系中的地位。其次，分析了金融檢察專業(yè)化的內(nèi)涵，包括職能專業(yè)化、機構(gòu)專業(yè)化、人員專業(yè)化、機制專業(yè)化四個方面。 第二部分研究分析金融檢察制度構(gòu)建的必要性，從我國現(xiàn)如今金融犯罪態(tài)勢問題、完善刑事司法體制、檢察職業(yè)化等不同角度分析，說明金融檢察制度的構(gòu)建有其現(xiàn)實的必要性。 第三部分研究分析了金融檢察制度構(gòu)建的基礎(chǔ)。首先，從理論基礎(chǔ)出發(fā)，說明金融檢察監(jiān)督制度的正當性；其次，金融檢察制度的構(gòu)建有一定的法律依據(jù)，通過梳理我國相關(guān)法律尋找在我國構(gòu)建金融檢察制度的適當性；最后，分析國外關(guān)于檢察制度，檢察專業(yè)化，檢察官專業(yè)化的立法例，為我國金融檢察制度的構(gòu)建提供借鑒意義。 第四部分研究我國金融檢察的現(xiàn)狀�，F(xiàn)階段，檢察機關(guān)對于金融犯罪監(jiān)督難、定罪難、公檢法三機關(guān)在發(fā)展金融刑事司法體制中存在著不平衡、檢察監(jiān)督手段單一、金融檢察專業(yè)人員缺乏等原因使得金融檢察監(jiān)督機制難以發(fā)揮實效。通過對檢察機關(guān)遇到的瓶頸進行分析，可以有針對性的構(gòu)建金融檢察制度。 第五部分，構(gòu)建金融檢察制度的專業(yè)化發(fā)展。構(gòu)建金融檢察制度應(yīng)堅持憲法定位、積極介入、補充性和服務(wù)金融發(fā)展的原則，處理好對內(nèi)和對外的關(guān)系。以合理的方式解決金融糾紛，建立起專業(yè)化的檢察機構(gòu)，專門化的捕訴銜接工作機制，，明確案件的范圍，培養(yǎng)優(yōu)秀的金融檢察人才。最后，妥善協(xié)調(diào)檢法、檢警、檢管關(guān)系，做好檢察引導(dǎo)偵查機制，建立好日常交流機制，對構(gòu)建合理高效的金融檢察機制是十分必要的。
[Abstract]:As the core embodiment of modern market economy, finance has permeated into the country, enterprises and people's life at all levels. Financial security is an important part of the whole national economic security and even national security. With the development of financial market to specialization, diversification and complication, the problem of financial crime has also increased, from more than 4000 cases transferred by procuratorial organs in 2006 to more than 12000 cases in 2010, the growth rate has reached 31%. As for the new situation in the financial field, new problems emerge in endlessly, which is bound to bring new challenges to the procuratorial organs' participation in the management of financial crimes. The fact that the procuratorial organs are facing the continuous growth of financial crimes and the relatively high degree of specialization in the financial field shows that, According to the traditional extensive mode of handling cases has not been able to do. The procuratorial organs need to adjust their working ideas, carry out prevention and punishment measures around the theory and practice of financial crime, establish and perfect the financial procuratorial organs, and turn to a specialized and meticulous mode of handling cases. The research content of this paper is divided into five parts: The first part is an overview of financial procuratorial and financial prosecutorial specialization. First of all, it explains the concept, characteristics and nature of financial procuratorial, and scientifically orientates the position of procuratorial supervision in the financial procuratorial system. Secondly, it analyzes the connotation of financial procuratorial specialization, including functional specialization, institutional specialization, personnel specialization and mechanism specialization. The second part studies and analyzes the necessity of financial procuratorial system construction, from the current situation of financial crime in China, improve the criminal justice system, procuratorial professionalization and other different angles. It shows that the construction of financial procuratorial system has its realistic necessity. The third part analyzes the foundation of financial procuratorial system. First of all, from the theoretical basis to explain the legitimacy of the financial procuratorial supervision system; secondly, the construction of the financial procuratorial system has a certain legal basis, through combing the relevant laws of our country to find the appropriate financial procuratorial system in China; Finally, the paper analyzes the legislation examples of procuratorial system, procuratorial specialization and procurator specialization in foreign countries, which provides reference for the construction of financial procuratorial system in China. The fourth part studies the present situation of financial procuratorial work in our country. At the present stage, it is difficult for procuratorial organs to supervise and convict financial crimes. There is an imbalance in the development of the financial criminal justice system among the three organs of the Public Security Bureau, the Procuratorate and the Court, and the means of procuratorial supervision are single. The lack of financial procuratorial professionals makes it difficult for the financial procuratorial supervision mechanism to be effective. By analyzing the bottleneck encountered by procuratorial organs, we can construct the financial procuratorial system. The fifth part, constructs the specialized development of the financial procuratorial system. To construct the financial procuratorial system, we should adhere to the constitutional orientation, actively intervene, supplement and serve the principles of financial development, and deal well with the relationship between internal and external. In order to solve the financial disputes in a reasonable way, we should set up specialized procuratorial organs, specialized mechanism of connection of arrest and prosecution, make clear the scope of cases, and train outstanding financial procuratorial talents. Finally, it is necessary to properly coordinate the relationship between procuratorial and police, police and procuratorate, to do a good job of procuratorial guidance and investigation mechanism, and to establish a good daily communication mechanism for the construction of a reasonable and efficient financial procuratorial mechanism.
【學位授予單位】：四川省社會科學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.28;D926.3

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 曹鳳岐;;金融國際化、金融危機與金融監(jiān)管[J];金融論壇;2012年02期

2 劉忠和;金融監(jiān)管的制度變革:從關(guān)聯(lián)方監(jiān)管到第三方監(jiān)管[J];當代經(jīng)濟研究;2005年08期

3 周佑勇;劉艷紅;;行政執(zhí)法與刑事司法相銜接的程序機制研究[J];東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年01期

4 張鴻巍;;美國檢察官職業(yè)化芻議[J];法學雜志;2011年01期

5 龍宗智;論檢察權(quán)的性質(zhì)與檢察機關(guān)的改革[J];法學;1999年10期

6 鄭少華;論金融監(jiān)管權(quán)的邊界[J];法學;2003年07期

7 陳寶富;陳邦達;;行政執(zhí)法與刑事司法銜接中檢察監(jiān)督的必要性[J];法學;2008年09期

8 陳輻寬;;檢察機關(guān)介入金融監(jiān)管的依據(jù)與標準[J];法學;2009年10期

9 吳衛(wèi)軍;;金融檢察介入金融監(jiān)管的實踐與探索[J];法學;2012年05期

10 張勇;;檢察一體化與金融檢察專門機構(gòu)職能模式選擇[J];法學;2012年05期

本文編號：1889551