發(fā)布時間：2018-05-15 12:49

  本文選題：貪污賄賂犯罪 + 立案�。� 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：立案是查辦貪污賄賂犯罪的開始，也是查辦貪污賄賂犯罪的難題之一。在目前我國貪污賄賂犯罪立案程序中，存在諸多問題。對立案條件和標準的把握也缺乏具體的法律法規(guī)。導(dǎo)致在司法實踐中不破不立、先破再立、錯誤立案等現(xiàn)象時有發(fā)生。對于我國貪污賄賂犯罪立案問題的研究成果也有不少，但大都是停留在設(shè)想階段，缺乏可操作性。 本文研究了現(xiàn)階段我國貪污賄賂犯罪立案的基本概念、特征、條件、標準、審查、決定、監(jiān)督和救濟。接著，，重點分析了目前我國貪污賄賂犯罪立案程序在立案審查、立案方式和立案監(jiān)督方面存在的問題，提出了幾點建議。第一，建議嚴格把握貪污賄賂犯罪立案條件和標準，不能過嚴而放縱犯罪，不能過松而侵犯人權(quán)。要正確理解立案階段的證據(jù)標準，做好證據(jù)審查工作，為能否做出立案決定提供依據(jù)。第二，建議根據(jù)個案具體情況正確選擇立案方式。第三，建議建立和健全有效的貪污賄賂犯罪立案監(jiān)督機制和立案救濟機制。第四，建議嚴格區(qū)分初查和偵查程序，完善初查程序，保障人權(quán)。希望通過以上研究，能夠?qū)ξ覈�貪污賄賂犯罪立案程序有一定的指導(dǎo)作用。
[Abstract]:Filing a case is the beginning of investigation of corruption and bribery crime, but also one of the difficult problems in investigating corruption and bribery crime. At present, there are many problems in the criminal procedure of corruption and bribery in our country. There is also a lack of specific laws and regulations to grasp the conditions and standards for filing a case. Causes in the judicial practice does not break not to stand, first to break and then to establish, wrong case and so on the phenomenon has occurred from time to time. There are a lot of research results on the problem of corruption and bribery in our country, but most of them remain in the stage of imagination and lack of maneuverability. This paper studies the basic concepts, characteristics, conditions, standards, reviews, decisions, supervision and remedies of corruption and bribery cases in China. Then, the paper analyzes the problems existing in the procedure of filing corruption and bribery in our country, and puts forward some suggestions. First, it is suggested that we should strictly grasp the conditions and standards of filing corruption and bribery crimes, and not indulge the crimes too strictly and violate human rights too loosely. It is necessary to correctly understand the standard of evidence at the stage of filing, and do well in the examination of evidence so as to provide the basis for making a decision on filing a case. Second, it is suggested that the case should be correctly selected according to the specific circumstances of the case. Thirdly, it is suggested to establish and perfect the effective supervision mechanism and remedy mechanism of corruption and bribery crimes. Fourth, we should strictly distinguish between initial investigation and investigation procedure, perfect initial investigation procedure and protect human rights. It is hoped that the above research will have a certain guiding effect on the procedure of filing corruption and bribery crimes in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭鳳蓮;胡文靜;;論受賄罪的立案標準[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

2 燕星宇;丁浩;;論中國的刑事立案標準[J];法制與社會;2009年20期

3 安菁;;檢察機關(guān)自偵案件的立案監(jiān)督工作機制研究[J];法制與社會;2010年24期

4 王健;方榮輝;陳浙城;;淺議“以事立案”在職務(wù)犯罪案件中的適用[J];法制與社會;2010年36期

5 劉玉江;;刑事立案意義的消解與制度重構(gòu)[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年03期

6 李海清;;以人為本與職務(wù)犯罪立案監(jiān)督關(guān)系辨析[J];傳承;2009年18期

7 王昌奎;田維武;王勐視;;司法人員職務(wù)犯罪“以事立案”模式研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

8 于敏;韓寧;;對我國刑事立案制度的重新審視[J];法制與社會;2009年34期

9 李德恩;;立案功能的沖突與立法調(diào)整[J];河北理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年02期

10 周標龍;;職務(wù)犯罪案件“立案難”問題探討[J];衡陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年05期

本文編號：1892528