發(fā)布時間：2018-05-20 11:29

  本文選題：“釣魚執(zhí)法” + 誘惑偵查�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：全國各地連續(xù)發(fā)生的“釣魚執(zhí)法”案件將我國行政機關(guān)在行政執(zhí)法上的問題顯露無疑。本文以上海市的兩起具有代表性的案件作為文章選取案件進行分析，本文由案件發(fā)生情況的介紹及案情爭議焦點的提出、刑事誘惑偵查手段能否運用于行政執(zhí)法活動、行政證據(jù)的合法性、非法營運的認(rèn)定這四部分組成。第一部分闡述案件當(dāng)時發(fā)生的具體情況，引出了與案件事實聯(lián)系緊密的爭議焦點，如:案件中刑事誘惑偵查的手段能否運用到行政執(zhí)法中來？作出具體行政行為所依據(jù)的證據(jù)是否具有合法性?執(zhí)法機關(guān)對非法營運的認(rèn)定是否妥當(dāng)和具有法律依據(jù)?文章第二部分則開始結(jié)合案情針對本文所提出的第一個爭議焦點進行法律分析。首先，文章專門解釋了案件中頻繁出現(xiàn)的“釣魚執(zhí)法”這一詞語的法律概念，說明“釣魚執(zhí)法”其實是誘惑偵查的另一種說法。隨后文章對刑事誘惑偵查的分類進行闡述，緊接著對“犯意誘發(fā)型”誘惑偵查手段在我國行政執(zhí)法中運用的違法性理由進行闡述。第三部分基于“釣魚執(zhí)法”所獲得的行政證據(jù)的合法性進行較為詳細的分析。第四部分討論了本案是否屬于非法營運的認(rèn)定問題。 本文以具有代表性的上海市釣魚執(zhí)法案件作為案例進行分析，找出案例中的爭議焦點，，進而陳述案件的法理分析，接著針對案件進行案件分析，已期為達到完善制度，根除釣魚執(zhí)法中的弊病，提高執(zhí)法人員的執(zhí)法水平，為行政執(zhí)法工作開創(chuàng)新的局面提供借鑒性的參考。
[Abstract]:The case of "Fishing law enforcement" that has occurred in all parts of the country will reveal the problem of administrative law enforcement by the administrative organs of our country. This article takes two representative cases of Shanghai as an article to analyze the case. This article is based on the introduction of the case and the focus of the case, and whether the criminal temptation investigation means can be used. The four parts of the administrative law enforcement activities, the legitimacy of administrative evidence and the identification of illegal operations are made. The first part expounds the specific circumstances of the case at that time and leads to the focus of the dispute with the facts of the case, such as whether the means of criminal temptation investigation in the case can be applied to administrative law enforcement to make specific administrative actions. Is the evidence based on the validity of the evidence? Is it appropriate and legal to identify the illegal operation by law enforcement agencies? The second part of the article begins with the legal analysis of the first dispute focus of this article. First, the article explains the law of "Fishing law enforcement" frequently appearing in the case. The concept of law shows that "Fishing law enforcement" is another kind of lure investigation. Then the article expounds the classification of criminal temptation investigation, and then expounds the illegality reasons used in the administrative law enforcement of "tempting hairstyle" in our country. Third parts are based on the administrative certificate obtained by "Fishing law enforcement". The fourth part discusses whether the case belongs to the identification of illegal operation.
This paper takes a representative case of Shanghai Fishing law enforcement as a case, finds out the focus of the case, and then states the legal analysis of the case, then analyzes the case in order to improve the system, eradicate the maladies in the law enforcement of fishing, raise the law enforcement level of the law enforcement personnel, and open the work for the administrative law enforcement. The innovation situation provides reference for reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 吳丹紅,孫孝福;論誘惑偵查[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2001年04期

2 李康;;淺議“釣魚執(zhí)法”的正當(dāng)性[J];法制與社會;2009年35期

3 鄭金蓉;侯敏;;“釣魚”式執(zhí)法的反思與探討[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2009年22期

4 周密;;關(guān)于整治非法營運的行政法律分析[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年05期

5 劉暢;;論行政執(zhí)法方式創(chuàng)新的法治路徑——以釣魚執(zhí)法方式為視角[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2011年04期

6 周悅;王華春;;“釣魚式”執(zhí)法:原因剖析與矯正路徑選擇[J];前沿;2010年13期

本文編號：1914438