發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-15 08:42

  本文選題：農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：退出　出處：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目前農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)因其有助于彌補(bǔ)我國(guó)農(nóng)村土地制度的缺陷，，而越來(lái)越為學(xué)者們所重視。農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出在彌補(bǔ)我國(guó)農(nóng)村土地土地制度的缺陷方面，可以發(fā)揮農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)所不能發(fā)揮的作用。但是農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出問(wèn)題卻沒(méi)有引起學(xué)界足夠的重視。本文針對(duì)筆者所發(fā)現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題，通過(guò)自己的思考分析，以期對(duì)解決農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出所存在的問(wèn)題有所助益。本文共分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分為農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)退出的基本問(wèn)題，本部分首先界定了土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出的相關(guān)概念，以明晰土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出的內(nèi)涵。進(jìn)而從土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出的必要性和可行性兩方面分析了完善土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出機(jī)制的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 第二部分為我國(guó)法律關(guān)于土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出的規(guī)定及缺陷。本部分首先對(duì)法律法規(guī)文本中關(guān)于農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出問(wèn)題的缺陷進(jìn)行了分析，認(rèn)為現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)中關(guān)于土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出的規(guī)定的缺陷有：法律概念不準(zhǔn)確，程序價(jià)值缺失以及難以回應(yīng)現(xiàn)實(shí)的需要。進(jìn)而分析了土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出的相關(guān)制度的不足之處。這些不足之處體現(xiàn)在：集體土地所有權(quán)主體虛位，農(nóng)地價(jià)格評(píng)估制度的缺失以及制度價(jià)值目標(biāo)和實(shí)施效果相互沖突。 第三部分為土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出的實(shí)踐和啟示。本部分首先對(duì)成都市溫江區(qū)的“雙放棄”進(jìn)社保的方式進(jìn)行的了分析，認(rèn)為其引導(dǎo)農(nóng)民自愿退出土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的做法固然可嘉，但是成都市溫江區(qū)的做法由政府主導(dǎo)，存在巨大的潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)；并且其“帶著土地進(jìn)城”的正當(dāng)性存疑。然后分析了重慶市的“土地?fù)Q戶籍”的方式，認(rèn)為這一方式存在農(nóng)民自愿退出的權(quán)利保障的困境以及“土地?fù)Q社�！钡暮戏ㄐ源嬉傻膯�(wèn)題。第四部分為土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出機(jī)制的完善。本部分首先分析了土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出所應(yīng)遵循的原則包括：公平原則，尊重農(nóng)民的土地權(quán)利的原則和統(tǒng)籌兼顧原則。進(jìn)而分析了完善土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出機(jī)制的具體途徑，認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)集體土地所有權(quán)主體進(jìn)行改造，完善土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出的法定事由以及自愿退出事由的規(guī)定。最后筆者認(rèn)為應(yīng)建立農(nóng)地價(jià)格評(píng)估制度，完善針對(duì)退地農(nóng)民的社會(huì)保障制度和完農(nóng)民再就業(yè)培訓(xùn)制度，從這三方面完善土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)退出的相關(guān)配套制度。
[Abstract]:At present, the rural land contract management rights transfer due to the defects in its help to make up for China's rural land system, and more and more valued by scholars. The management right of rural land contracting for rural land exit defects in the land system of our country, can play the rural contracted land circulation can play a role but. The contracted management right of rural land exit problem has not attracted enough attention in academic circles. This paper found in the problem, through their own thinking and analysis, in order to help solve the problem of rural land contracting right exit. This paper is divided into four parts:
The first part is the basic issues from the rural land contract management, this part firstly defines the relevant concepts of land contract management right exit, to clarify the connotation of land contracting right exit. Two aspects of the necessity and feasibility to withdraw from the land contract management right and analyzes the realistic meaning of improving land contract and management rights exit mechanism.
The second part of China's laws and regulations on land contracting right and exit defects. This part carries on the analysis of the rural land contractual management right exit the defect of legal text, defects of regulations on contracted land management right out of the existing laws and regulations are: the legal concept is not accurate, lack of procedural value and it is difficult to respond to the needs of the reality. And then analyzes the shortcomings of land contracting system exit. These deficiencies reflected in: absent subject in collective land ownership, conflicting value goal and lack of system and implementation effect of farmland price evaluation system.
The third part is the practice and Enlightenment of land contracting right exit. The first part of the Chengdu District of Wenjiang City, the "double up" into social security was analyzed, the guide farmers voluntary withdrawal of the right to land contractual management practice is commendable, but the Chengdu city Wenjiang district practice led by the government, there are potential risks great; and its legitimacy with land into the city "in doubt. And then analyzes the Chongqing city land for household registration", argues for the existence of voluntary withdrawal from the protection of the rights and the predicament of "legitimacy of land for social security" the question in this way. The fourth part is to improve the exit mechanism of land contract the right to operate. This part of the first analysis including the right to land contractual management should follow the principles: the principle of fairness, out of respect for the principle of land rights of farmers and the principle of overall planning. Further analysis of the specific ways to improve the land contracting right of exit mechanism, should be considered for the transformation of the collective land ownership, perfecting the legal reasons of the contracted management of land exit regulations and voluntary withdrawal. At last, the author thinks that the subject should establish farmland price evaluation system, perfect for the back of the social security system of the farmers and farmers the employment training system, improve the supporting system of land contracting right exit from these three aspects.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.32;D923.6

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 常曉棟;;物權(quán)法立法技術(shù)探微[A];第二屆全國(guó)邊緣法學(xué)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

2 張效羽;;隱私權(quán)的道德困境及其化解——論公法隱私權(quán)與私法隱私權(quán)[A];第四屆全國(guó)公法學(xué)博士生論壇論文集[C];2009年

3 鄧煥民;;國(guó)家效用與中國(guó)農(nóng)地制度[A];2005中國(guó)制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)年會(huì)精選論文（第一部分）[C];2005年

4 余偉京;余美峰;蔡亮;;論農(nóng)村集體土地所有權(quán)及農(nóng)村國(guó)有土地使用權(quán)的虛位——農(nóng)村土地資源可持續(xù)利用的產(chǎn)權(quán)基礎(chǔ)理論探究[A];林業(yè)、森林與野生動(dòng)植物資源保護(hù)法制建設(shè)研究——2004年中國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集（第四冊(cè)）[C];2004年

5 楊朝霞;;論動(dòng)物福利立法的定位——道德法律化的視角[A];水資源可持續(xù)利用與水生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)的法律問(wèn)題研究——2008年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集[C];2008年

6 鄒碧華;王建平;陳婷婷;;審視與探索——要件審判九步法的提出和運(yùn)用[A];全國(guó)法院系統(tǒng)第二十二屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

7 李杰;;法官機(jī)械司法的博弈分析[A];全國(guó)法院系統(tǒng)第二十二屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

8 李翌平;;類比房產(chǎn)買賣對(duì)墓穴買賣中的土地財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)問(wèn)題分析[A];第三屆西部律師發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2010年

9 丁關(guān)良;;農(nóng)村社區(qū)集體主體存在問(wèn)題的法律思考和重構(gòu)對(duì)策研究——以集體土地為例剖析[A];社會(huì)主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)研究——中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)會(huì)2006年年會(huì)暨社會(huì)主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2006年

10 朱新力;陳無(wú)風(fēng);;行政法對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)作用的邊際思考——寫在《物權(quán)法》出臺(tái)以后[A];財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)與行政法保護(hù)——中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)行政法學(xué)研究會(huì)2007年年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李長(zhǎng)坤;刑事涉案財(cái)物處理制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 吳一鳴;英美物權(quán)法之大陸法解讀[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

3 尹偉琴;民國(guó)祭田法律制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

4 樸恩惠;韓國(guó)傳貰權(quán)制度研究——兼與中國(guó)典權(quán)比較[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

5 顏曉閩;美國(guó)證券法律史研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

6 魏樹發(fā);論我國(guó)成年監(jiān)護(hù)制度改革[D];福建師范大學(xué);2010年

7 孫妍;當(dāng)代中國(guó)物權(quán)法基本問(wèn)題的反思[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

8 單平基;水權(quán)取得及轉(zhuǎn)讓制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

9 侯德斌;農(nóng)民集體成員權(quán)利研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

10 張俊峰;信托財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)能的效用優(yōu)化分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：1615275