發(fā)布時間：2018-03-20 23:35

  本文選題：漁業(yè)權保護　切入點：物權化　出處：《暨南大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：長久以來，漁業(yè)者依水作業(yè)，在沿岸水域細心耕耘，推動著國民經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展及滿足了國民對高蛋白物質(zhì)的需求。眾所周知，沿岸漁業(yè)具有高收入的同時也具有機動性低、作業(yè)區(qū)域受限等特點，而隨著我國經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，諸如海洋污染事故、水下光纜鋪設、海港建設等經(jīng)濟開發(fā)利用行為不斷侵害著漁業(yè)者對沿岸水域開發(fā)利用的權利。 漁業(yè)權一直以來被認定是附屬于行政權力的權利，在國家行為的主導下，無論是許可的撤銷抑或征收、征用行為，漁業(yè)者都不能主張其權利；《物權法》出臺后在用益物權篇規(guī)定了養(yǎng)殖權和捕撈權，卻未規(guī)定漁業(yè)權制度，其原因主要是對漁業(yè)權的權利屬性、性質(zhì)及與現(xiàn)有法律制度的協(xié)調(diào)沒有確論，由此，漁業(yè)權未有物權化的保護。漁業(yè)權制度的目的是對沿岸水域的綜合利用、水產(chǎn)資源保護，并在此范圍內(nèi)給予漁業(yè)者對水域排他使用的權利以保障沿岸漁業(yè)者的權益。本文立足于在私法上對漁業(yè)權保護進行研究，為漁業(yè)權制度的完善提供有益的建議。 第一部分，對漁業(yè)權的基本法理進行闡述，用以確立論文的理論基礎。漁業(yè)權的概念一直以來是理論界爭論不休的問題，尤其是對漁業(yè)權的主體及客體界定不清。本文在綜合國內(nèi)外研究的基礎上對此理論問題進行概述，尋得漁業(yè)權的物權化保護理論根據(jù)，以為文章論證鋪墊。 第二部分，提出我國漁業(yè)權在現(xiàn)階段上存在的問題與原因。我國漁業(yè)權保護的現(xiàn)實問題是：漁業(yè)權變動制度問題凸顯、保護方法不足與期限和登記制度的欠缺，其主要原因是漁業(yè)權在立法上的缺失與在理論上對漁業(yè)權法律性質(zhì)的認識不足。 第三部分，分析物權化的漁業(yè)權保護的可行性。漁業(yè)權保護是否可行需在兩個層級上進行分析:一是理論上具有可行性；二是能夠與我國現(xiàn)行相關制度進行銜接。其后，通過對域外漁業(yè)權保護的考察研究，也證明出漁業(yè)權保護存在的現(xiàn)實可能。 第四部分，《物權法》未能規(guī)定漁業(yè)權制度，是立法上的一大缺憾，以致現(xiàn)實中對漁業(yè)法律關系的調(diào)整仍然延續(xù)著行政權力規(guī)制的主導，在此枷鎖的桎梏下難以實現(xiàn)權利的放飛。本部分以維護漁業(yè)者權益為目標，通過漁業(yè)權的物權化制度構建以作為漁業(yè)權制度設立的建議。
[Abstract]:For a long time, fishers have worked in accordance with water and cultivated carefully in coastal waters, which has promoted the development of the national economy and satisfied the people's demand for high-protein substances. As we all know, coastal fisheries have high incomes and low mobility. With the development of our country's economy, such as marine pollution accident, underwater optical cable laying, seaport construction and other economic exploitation and utilization behavior, the fishery's rights of exploitation and utilization of coastal waters have been continuously infringed. Fishery right has always been regarded as the right attached to administrative power. Under the guidance of state behavior, whether the revocation of permission, expropriation or expropriation, After the publication of the Real right Law, the aquaculture and fishing rights are stipulated in the usufruct right, but not the fishery right system, which is mainly due to the property of the fishery right. The nature and coordination with the existing legal system are uncertain, thus, the fishery rights are not protected in rem. The purpose of the fishery rights system is the comprehensive utilization of coastal waters and the protection of aquatic resources, To protect the rights and interests of the coastal fisheries, this paper is based on the research on the protection of fishery rights in private law, and provides useful suggestions for the improvement of fishery rights system. In the first part, the basic legal theory of fishery right is expounded to establish the theoretical basis of the paper. The concept of fishery right has always been a controversial issue in the theoretical circle. In particular, the definition of the subject and object of fishery right is not clear. This paper summarizes this theoretical problem on the basis of synthesizing domestic and foreign research, and finds the theoretical basis for the protection of fishery right in real right, thus laying the groundwork for the article to demonstrate. In the second part, the author points out the existing problems and reasons of fishery right in our country at the present stage. The realistic problems of fishery right protection in our country are as follows: the change system of fishery right is prominent, the method of protection is insufficient and the time limit and the lack of registration system are not enough. The main reasons are the lack of legislation and the lack of understanding of the legal nature of fishery rights in theory. The third part analyzes the feasibility of the protection of fishery rights in real right. The feasibility of fishery right protection needs to be analyzed at two levels: one is theoretically feasible; the other is to be able to link up with the current relevant system of our country. Through the investigation and research on the protection of fishery right, it is proved that the protection of fishery right exists in reality. In the 4th part, the failure of the Real right Law to regulate the fishery right system is a major shortcoming in the legislation, so that the adjustment of the fishery legal relationship in reality still continues the leading role of the administrative power regulation. It is difficult to realize the release of the right under the shackles of this yoke. This part aims at safeguarding the rights and interests of the fishery, and constructs the system of fishery rights as the suggestion of the establishment of the fishery right system by means of the system of the real right of the fishery right.
【學位授予單位】：暨南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.2;D922.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 樂家華;李晟;;日本的漁業(yè)權制度[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2009年09期

2 孟勤國;;有思想無行動——評物權法草案的用益物權[J];法學評論;2006年01期

3 周永麗;黃碩琳;;日本基于漁民管理體系的簡析[J];廣東農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2010年03期

4 金可可;;漁業(yè)權基礎理論研究[J];環(huán)境資源法論叢;2004年00期

5 崔建遠;關于漁業(yè)權的探討[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2003年03期

6 王利明;;試論《物權法》中海域使用權的性質(zhì)和特點[J];社會科學研究;2008年04期

7 劉舜斌;;漁業(yè)權研究(Ⅰ)[J];中國海洋大學學報(社會科學版);2006年04期

，

本文編號：1641292