發(fā)布時間：2018-03-21 01:37

  本文選題：網(wǎng)絡問責　切入點：行政問責　出處：《寧波大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著網(wǎng)絡社會的不斷成熟，網(wǎng)絡為公民行政問責提供了新的實現(xiàn)形式即網(wǎng)絡問責。網(wǎng)絡問責又可稱為網(wǎng)絡公民行政問責，是公民以網(wǎng)絡為平臺，通過批評、建議、檢舉、揭發(fā)等途徑，針對政府及其行政人員的失職行為進行質(zhì)詢并要求承擔責任的一種活動。網(wǎng)絡問責是由異體問責展開的對公權力的行政問責，網(wǎng)絡問責具有匿名性、高效性、大眾性的特征。本文通過對網(wǎng)絡問責在我國的理論基礎和網(wǎng)絡問責的主要問題、法律規(guī)制的必要性進行闡釋，推導出我國網(wǎng)絡問責機制良性發(fā)展的根本出路，即實現(xiàn)網(wǎng)絡問責法律規(guī)制。 近年來網(wǎng)絡問責運行已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了一些問題，主要表現(xiàn)為問責啟動時網(wǎng)絡問責法律界限模糊，使得網(wǎng)絡問責法律地位、問責范圍沒有明確；問責過程中網(wǎng)絡問責主體素質(zhì)不均，網(wǎng)絡問責信息真實存疑，使得侵犯被問責對象權益的事件頻發(fā)；問責深入時，網(wǎng)絡問責對接機制缺乏，使得網(wǎng)絡問責結果難以保障�？墒蔷W(wǎng)絡問責在監(jiān)督行政權力、保障公民權利、化解社會矛盾等方面起著重要的作用。運用法律手段對網(wǎng)絡問責進行規(guī)制是最為合理的選擇，以此解決網(wǎng)絡問責運行中出現(xiàn)的問題，發(fā)揮網(wǎng)絡問責強而有力的功能。這樣才是對我國行政問責實踐中現(xiàn)實需要的積極回應，才是解決我國行政問責困境的必然選擇。 在已有的行政理論基礎之上，聯(lián)系實際，可以尋找到建立網(wǎng)絡問責法律規(guī)制的基礎理論，包括網(wǎng)絡問責的概念、網(wǎng)絡問責的特點，網(wǎng)絡問責動態(tài)運行模式，結合網(wǎng)絡問責實踐中存在的問題，，論證網(wǎng)絡問責法律規(guī)制的必要性，在此基礎上對網(wǎng)絡問責進行深入研究，找到網(wǎng)絡問責中需要進行法律規(guī)制的四個方面：劃分權責界限，實現(xiàn)信息公開，協(xié)調(diào)權力沖突，構建對接機制。
[Abstract]:With the development of the network society, the network provides a new way to realize the citizen's administrative accountability, that is, the network accountability, which can be called the network citizen's administrative accountability, and it is the citizen who takes the network as the platform, through the criticism, the suggestion, the prosecution. It is an activity to question the government and its administrative personnel for their dereliction of duty and to assume responsibility. Network accountability is the administrative accountability of public power, which is carried out by heterogeneous accountability, which is anonymous and efficient. This paper explains the theoretical basis of network accountability in China, the main problems of network accountability, the necessity of legal regulation, and deduces the fundamental way out for the benign development of network accountability mechanism in China. That is to achieve the legal regulation of network accountability. In recent years, there have been some problems in the operation of network accountability, mainly manifested in the blurring of the legal boundaries of network accountability when the accountability starts, which makes the legal status of network accountability and the scope of accountability unclear; the quality of network accountability subjects is uneven in the process of accountability. The network accountability information is true and doubtful, which makes the violation of the rights and interests of the accountable object frequent; when the accountability goes deep, the network accountability docking mechanism is lacking, which makes the network accountability result difficult to guarantee. However, the network accountability is to supervise the administrative power. It is the most reasonable choice to use legal means to regulate the network accountability in order to solve the problems in the operation of network accountability, which plays an important role in protecting citizens' rights and resolving social contradictions. Giving full play to the strong and powerful function of network accountability is the positive response to the actual needs in the practice of administrative accountability in our country and the inevitable choice to solve the dilemma of administrative accountability in our country. On the basis of the existing administrative theory and practice, we can find the basic theory of establishing the legal regulation of network accountability, including the concept of network accountability, the characteristics of network accountability, the dynamic operation mode of network accountability. Combined with the problems existing in the practice of network accountability, this paper demonstrates the necessity of the legal regulation of network accountability, and on this basis makes a thorough study of network accountability, and finds out four aspects of legal regulation in network accountability: dividing the limits of power and responsibility. Realize information publicity, coordinate power conflict, construct docking mechanism.
【學位授予單位】：寧波大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 周亞越;韓志明;;公民網(wǎng)絡問責:行動邏輯與要素分析[J];北京航空航天大學學報(社會科學版);2011年05期

2 吳釗;;論隱私權與知情權的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];法制與社會;2007年11期

3 林天保;;我國官員問責制面臨的問題及其出路[J];法制與社會;2008年19期

4 周亞越;;網(wǎng)絡問責:公民問責的范式轉(zhuǎn)換與價值考量[J];江漢論壇;2012年01期

5 王天笑;;論“網(wǎng)絡公民問責”的異化及其消解[J];理論導刊;2011年01期

6 毛e��

本文編號：1641684