發(fā)布時間：2018-05-04 06:13

  本文選題：專利權(quán) + 質(zhì)押��； 參考：《西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前科技型中小企業(yè)的融資和發(fā)展問題受到國家越來越多的關(guān)注和重視。專利權(quán)質(zhì)押可以促進企業(yè)創(chuàng)新動力、幫助解決科技型中小企業(yè)融資難的問題,推動我國經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型和發(fā)展。在這種背景下,我國國務(wù)院、人民銀行、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局等機構(gòu)相繼出臺政策,促進專利權(quán)質(zhì)押業(yè)務(wù)的展開,各地逐漸開展、創(chuàng)新專利權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的模式。自第一批知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資試點建立,已經(jīng)過去了五年,與初期摸索階段不同,現(xiàn)在各地已經(jīng)有了可以實施的促進方案、各種專利權(quán)質(zhì)押平臺已經(jīng)初具雛形。但是,在新的形勢下,各種模式又有一些共同面臨的困難。正是在這樣的背景下,論文對專利權(quán)質(zhì)押的開展進行了探討,分析了其中的主要問題,并就專利權(quán)質(zhì)押評估環(huán)節(jié)給出一些思考和建議。 本文基本思路如下： 第一部分為緒論,闡述本文寫作的背景和意義、研究綜述以及本文的研究方法及框架。 第二部分從專利權(quán)的相關(guān)理論概念出發(fā),對專利權(quán)相關(guān)概念、抵押和質(zhì)押等相關(guān)概念做了辨析,同時結(jié)合專利權(quán)特征初步分析其在質(zhì)押中表現(xiàn)出來的特性。闡述了我國整體專利權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的開展現(xiàn)狀及推進專利權(quán)質(zhì)押融資所面臨的共同問題。 第三部分就質(zhì)押環(huán)節(jié)中的專利權(quán)價值評估做了探討,比較了幾種常見的評估價值類型,并提出采用抵押價值類型的原理。在價值類型的原則下,探討了不同的評估方法的適用性。本文擬采用收益法,在價值類型的指引下,結(jié)合傳統(tǒng)差額法和分成率法,將收益分成率的行業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和企業(yè)自身因素結(jié)合,著重探討如何對收益法中分成率的確定,并討論了如何確定分成對象、折現(xiàn)率、收益年限等參數(shù)。 第四部分以一個擁有少量專利權(quán)的科技型企業(yè)為例,來說明如何用上述思路在質(zhì)押條件下評估專利權(quán)價值。 第五部分從外部環(huán)境和新的商業(yè)舉措方面為專利權(quán)風(fēng)險控制提出一些建議。
[Abstract]:At present, more and more attention has been paid to the financing and development of S & T SMEs. The pledge of patent right can promote the innovation power of enterprises, help solve the problem of financing difficulty of small and medium-sized technological enterprises, and promote the economic transformation and development of our country. In this context, the State Council, the people's Bank of China, the intellectual property Office and other institutions have issued policies to promote the development of patent pledge business, local gradually launched, innovative mode of patent pledge financing. It has been five years since the first batch of IPR pledge financing was established, which is different from the initial stage of exploration. Now there are some promotion schemes that can be implemented in various places, and various patent pledge platforms have already taken shape. However, in the new situation, the various models also have some common difficulties. Under this background, the paper discusses the development of patent pledge, analyzes the main problems, and gives some thoughts and suggestions on the evaluation of patent pledge. The basic ideas of this paper are as follows: The first part is the introduction, which describes the background and significance of this paper, the research review and the research methods and framework of this paper. In the second part, the related concepts of patent right, mortgage, pledge and so on are analyzed, and the characteristics of the pledge are analyzed in combination with the characteristics of patent right. This paper expounds the present situation of the whole patent mortgage financing in China and the common problems faced in the promotion of patent pledge financing. The third part discusses the evaluation of patent value in pledge link, compares several kinds of common valuation value types, and puts forward the principle of using mortgage value type. Under the principle of value type, the applicability of different evaluation methods is discussed. In this paper, under the guidance of the value type, combining the traditional difference method and the share rate method, combining the industry standard of the income share rate with the enterprise's own factors, this paper focuses on how to determine the share rate in the income method. And discussed how to determine the dividing object, discount rate, income years and other parameters. The fourth part takes a technological enterprise with a small amount of patent rights as an example to illustrate how to evaluate the value of patent under the condition of pledge. The fifth part puts forward some suggestions for patent risk control from external environment and new business measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.4;F275;F276.44

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 李愛華,丁戰(zhàn);淺析技術(shù)資產(chǎn)評估時收益分成率的確定方法[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2002年03期

2 高麗萍;薄建奎;;基于實物期權(quán)的專利權(quán)評估方法初探[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟;2012年20期

3 文豪;汪海粟;陳保國;容伯軒;;中小企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款的業(yè)務(wù)鏈分析——基于靜態(tài)結(jié)構(gòu)與運行機制的視角[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2011年03期

4 張林;;專利權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款風(fēng)險之化解——兼評相關(guān)地方新出臺的專利權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款管理辦法[J];科技與法律;2009年06期

5 黃生權(quán);;基于實物期權(quán)理論的專利權(quán)價值評估方法研究[J];科技進步與對策;2006年06期

6 楊晨;陶晶;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中的政府政策配置研究[J];科技進步與對策;2010年13期

7 薛明皋;劉t樍，

本文編號：1841915