發(fā)布時間：2018-03-04 21:33

  本文選題：小學生　切入點：社會排斥　出處：《沈陽師范大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：在兒童發(fā)展領域,社會排斥被定義為阻礙其他兒童獲得友誼或加入社會團體。社會排斥既是個體間友誼形成的基礎,同時也可以表現(xiàn)為敵對的形式,并以傷害他人為目的。并且無論以何種方式表現(xiàn)出的社會排斥,都會造成兒童在情緒和心理上的不良后果。本研究的目的在于探索小學生社會排斥的結(jié)構(gòu)并編制適用于我國小學生群體的社會排斥自測問卷。本研究通過查閱國內(nèi)外相關文獻,對40名小學生、23名小學一線教師進行訪談,以及征求有關專家意見,提出了小學生社會排斥的五因素模型,編制了兒童社會排斥的預測問卷。根據(jù)項目分析以及對394份預測問卷進行探索性因素分析的結(jié)果,對項目進行刪減,并將初始問卷中兩個維度進行合并,將小學生社會排斥的五因素模型調(diào)整為四因素模型,最終形成兒童社會排斥的正式問卷;通過對來自沈陽市5所學校的1570份3-6年級小學生進行正式問卷的施測得到的有效問卷進行的統(tǒng)計分析,考察了問卷的信效度并探討了社會排斥問卷得分在人口學變量上的差異。本研究結(jié)果表明:(1)我國小學生社會排斥由四個維度組成,包括拒絕、忽視、中傷以及差別對待。(2)根據(jù)本研究建構(gòu)的理論模型編制的《小學生社會排斥問卷》具有較好的信效度,可以為小學心理健康教育中有關兒童社會交往的研究提供測量工具。(3)小學生社會排斥問卷得分在性別、生源地、年級、學習成績、是否為班干、學校類型、家庭類型以及父母婚姻狀況上差異顯著。在性別方面,男生的社會排斥程度比女生高;生源地方面,生源地為農(nóng)村的學生社會排斥問卷總分以及各維度得分均顯著高于城鎮(zhèn)學生;年級方面,四個年級的被試社會排斥問卷總分差異顯著,其中三年級兒童的社會排斥得分顯著高于其他三個年級;在學習成績方面,學習成績低的學生社會排斥問卷總分以及各維度得分顯著高于成績高的學生;班干差異上,班級干部社會排斥問卷總分以及各維度得分都顯著低于普通學生;在不同學校類型中,市區(qū)農(nóng)民工小學生的社會排斥得分顯著高于其他各類型學校兒童;而在不同家庭類型的被試中,單親家庭的兒童社會排斥問卷總分以及在各維度上的得分均顯著高于其他類型家庭的兒童,而核心家庭大家庭的兒童得分則顯著低于其他兒童。文章最后討論了兒童社會排斥研究的教育啟示。
[Abstract]:In the field of child development, social exclusion is defined as preventing other children from gaining friendship or joining social groups. Social exclusion is not only the basis of friendship between individuals, but also a form of hostility. And with a view to harming others. And in any way social exclusion, The purpose of this study is to explore the structure of primary school students' social exclusion and to compile a self-test questionnaire of social exclusion for primary school students in China. An interview was conducted among 40 primary school teachers and 23 primary school teachers, and a five-factor model of primary school students' social exclusion was proposed. According to the results of item analysis and exploratory factor analysis of 394 forecasting questionnaires, the items were deleted and the two dimensions of the initial questionnaire were combined. The five-factor model of primary school students' social exclusion is adjusted to four-factor model, and a formal questionnaire for children's social exclusion is formed. Based on the statistical analysis of 1570 valid questionnaires of pupils in grades 3-6 from 5 schools in Shenyang, The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were investigated and the difference of the score of social exclusion questionnaire in demographic variables was discussed. The results show that the social exclusion of primary school students in China consists of four dimensions, including rejection, neglect, and social exclusion. According to the theoretical model constructed by this study, the questionnaire on Social exclusion of Primary School students has good reliability and validity. It can be used as a measuring tool for the study of children's social interaction in primary school mental health education.) pupils' social exclusion questionnaire scores in gender, place of origin, grade, academic achievement, whether in class, school type, or not. There were significant differences in the type of family and marital status of parents. In terms of gender, male students were more socially excluded than girls. The total scores and dimensions of social exclusion questionnaire in rural areas were significantly higher than those of urban students, and there were significant differences in the total scores of social exclusion questionnaires among the four grades. The score of social exclusion of the third grade children was significantly higher than that of the other three grades; in the aspect of learning achievement, the total score and the scores of each dimension of the social exclusion questionnaire of the students with low academic achievement were significantly higher than those of the students with high scores. The total scores of class cadres' social exclusion questionnaire and the scores of each dimension were significantly lower than those of ordinary students, and in different school types, the scores of social exclusion of primary school students of rural migrant workers in urban areas were significantly higher than those of other types of school children. However, in the subjects of different family types, the total score of social exclusion questionnaire for children from single-parent families and the scores in each dimension were significantly higher than those of children from other types of families. However, the score of children in nuclear family is significantly lower than that of other children. Finally, the educational implications of the study on social exclusion of children are discussed.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B844.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 王紫薇;涂平;;社會排斥情境下自我關注變化的性別差異[J];心理學報;2014年11期

2 張珊珊;張野;;兒童期社會排斥研究及其對促進兒童發(fā)展的意義[J];幼兒教育;2013年36期

3 劉霞;趙景欣;申繼亮;;歧視知覺對城市流動兒童幸福感的影響:中介機制及歸屬需要的調(diào)節(jié)作用[J];心理學報;2013年05期

4 吳繼霞;黃希庭;;誠信結(jié)構(gòu)初探[J];心理學報;2012年03期

5 師保國;徐玲;許晶晶;;流動兒童幸福感、安全感及其與社會排斥的關系[J];心理科學;2009年06期

6 杜建政;夏冰麗;;心理學視野中的社會排斥[J];心理科學進展;2008年06期

7 林崇德;離異家庭子女心理的特點[J];北京師范大學學報;1992年01期

，

本文編號：1567430