發(fā)布時間：2018-01-01 19:28

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：上市公司成長壓力對其并購行為與績效的影響研究　出處：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 企業(yè)成長壓力 并購行為 并購績效 資本市場 區(qū)域制度環(huán)境

【摘要】：企業(yè)成長是企業(yè)永恒不變的追求,并購成長是企業(yè)成長的一個重要方式。近年來,并購異�；钴S,巨頭公司合并和借殼上市兩種并購方式成為新趨勢。阿里巴巴、騰訊、萬達等企業(yè)不斷創(chuàng)新的同時,也在頻繁的并購,我國企業(yè)并購交易規(guī)模不斷擴大,2015年交易金額達到1.04萬億元。隨著我國證券市場的發(fā)展完善,并購活動也得到更規(guī)范的法律支持和制度支持。關(guān)于企業(yè)成長與并購關(guān)系的研究主要是企業(yè)并購對企業(yè)成長的影響作用和企業(yè)成長不同周期選擇的并購模式兩個方向分析。關(guān)于企業(yè)成長壓力的研究目前較少,企業(yè)成長壓力與并購的關(guān)系的研究文獻更少。本文以國內(nèi)外學(xué)者的研究為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合我國資本市場和區(qū)域制度環(huán)境兩個因素,分析企業(yè)成長壓力對企業(yè)并購與績效的影響。通過理論分析,進而提出研究假設(shè),探討我國不同資本市場上和不同區(qū)域制度環(huán)境的上市公司企業(yè)成長壓力與并購行為的關(guān)系,同時研究并購績效,豐富企業(yè)成長壓力與并購關(guān)系方面的研究。主要從以下幾個章節(jié)探討:第1章闡述本文的研究背景,提出本文研究的問題,介紹研究的理論意義和現(xiàn)實意義,并說明本文的研究思路;第2章對國內(nèi)外關(guān)于企業(yè)成長壓力對企業(yè)并購行為與績效的研究結(jié)論進行回顧,并對以往研究做出評述,為本文的研究奠定理論基礎(chǔ);第3章主要分析企業(yè)成長壓力與并購行為的關(guān)系,提出研究假設(shè),構(gòu)建研究模型,闡釋各變量的選擇和具體測量方式,交代本文的樣本選取及數(shù)據(jù)來源,然后進行實證檢驗;第4章在前文研究的基礎(chǔ)上實證分析企業(yè)成長壓力與并購績效的關(guān)系。第5章,對本文研究結(jié)論進行總結(jié),分析研究對企業(yè)以后并購的啟示,并提出本文研究不足之處及未來研究可能的改進之處。本文主要得出以下結(jié)論:1、對于之前四年發(fā)生過至少一次并購的非有機成長企業(yè),企業(yè)自身成長壓力和相對行業(yè)成長壓力與并購行為正相關(guān),企業(yè)成長越慢越偏好并購。2、對于非有機成長企業(yè),資本市場對企業(yè)自身成長成長壓力和相對行業(yè)成長壓力與并購行為的關(guān)系均具有調(diào)節(jié)作用,區(qū)域制度環(huán)境對企業(yè)自身成長壓力和相對行業(yè)成長壓力與并購行為的關(guān)系均不具有調(diào)節(jié)作用。3、對于有機成長企業(yè)和非有機成長企業(yè),自身成長速度和相對行業(yè)成長速度與并購績效具有正相關(guān)關(guān)系,企業(yè)成長速度越快并購績效越好,企業(yè)成長速度越慢并購績效越差。4、對于有機成長企業(yè)和非有機成長企業(yè),資本市場對企業(yè)成長速度與并購績效之間的關(guān)系具有調(diào)節(jié)作用,區(qū)域制度環(huán)境對企業(yè)自身成長速度與并購績效之間的關(guān)系也具有調(diào)節(jié)作用。
[Abstract]:Enterprise growth is the eternal pursuit of enterprises, M & A growth is an important way of enterprise growth. In recent years, M & A is very active. Merger of giant companies and backdoor listing become a new trend. Alibaba, Tencent, Wanda and other enterprises are constantly innovating, but also frequent M & A, the scale of M & A transactions in China is expanding. In 2015, the transaction amount reached 1.04 tillion yuan. With the development of China's securities market. M & A activities also get more normative legal and institutional support. Research on the relationship between Enterprise growth and M & A. the impact of M & A on Enterprise growth and the Mode of M & A in different cycles of Enterprise growth. Direction analysis. There are few researches on the pressure of enterprise growth. There is less literature on the relationship between growth pressure and mergers and acquisitions. Based on the research of domestic and foreign scholars, this paper combines the two factors of capital market and regional institutional environment. This paper analyzes the influence of growth pressure on M & A and performance. Through theoretical analysis, it puts forward the research hypotheses. This paper discusses the relationship between the growth pressure and M & A behavior of listed companies in different capital markets and different regional institutional environments, and studies the M & A performance at the same time. Enrich the research on the relationship between growth pressure and mergers and acquisitions. Mainly from the following chapters: chapter 1 describes the background of this paper, puts forward the problems of this study, introduces the theoretical and practical significance of the study. And explain the research ideas of this paper; Chapter 2 reviews the domestic and foreign research conclusions on the relationship between corporate growth pressure and M & A behavior and performance, and makes a comment on the previous studies, which lays a theoretical foundation for this study. Chapter 3 mainly analyzes the relationship between growth pressure and M & A behavior, puts forward research hypothesis, constructs research model, explains the selection of variables and specific measurement methods, and explains the sample selection and data source of this paper. Then the empirical test is carried out; Chapter 4 empirically analyzes the relationship between growth pressure and M & A performance on the basis of the previous research. Chapter 5 summarizes the conclusions of this study and analyzes the implications for future M & A. And put forward the shortcomings of this study and possible improvements in future research. This paper mainly draws the following conclusion: 1, for the previous four years at least once merger and acquisition of non-organic growth enterprises. The growth pressure and relative industry growth pressure are positively related to M & A behavior. The slower the growth of enterprises, the more preference M A. 2, for non-organic growth enterprises. The capital market can regulate the relationship between the growth pressure of the enterprise itself and the relative growth pressure of the industry and the M & A behavior. The regional institutional environment has no regulating effect on the relationship between the growth pressure of the enterprise itself and the relative growth pressure of the industry and the M & A behavior. It is also useful for the organic growth enterprises and non-organic growth enterprises. Growth rate and relative industry growth rate has a positive correlation with M & A performance. The faster the growth rate, the better the M & A performance, the slower the growth rate, the worse the M & A performance. For organic growth enterprises and non-organic growth enterprises, the capital market plays a regulatory role in the relationship between the growth rate and M & A performance. Regional institutional environment also regulates the relationship between enterprise growth rate and M & A performance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F271;F832.51;F275

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 辜勝阻;莊芹芹;曹譽波;;構(gòu)建服務(wù)實體經(jīng)濟多層次資本市場的路徑選擇[J];管理世界;2016年04期

2 于成永;滕穎;;制度環(huán)境與跨區(qū)域并購效應(yīng)關(guān)系研究[J];會計之友;2016年08期

3 陳仕華;盧昌崇;姜廣省;王雅茹;;國企高管政治晉升對企業(yè)并購行為的影響——基于企業(yè)成長壓力理論的實證研究[J];管理世界;2015年09期

4 段野;于鳴;汪金愛;;制度環(huán)境、政治關(guān)系與控制權(quán)收購模式選擇[J];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2015年06期

5 同生輝;王駿;;中央企業(yè)上市公司并購績效的實證研究[J];中央財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2015年05期

6 劉偉;;市場經(jīng)濟秩序與法律制度和法治精神[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2015年01期

7 王玉春;梁洪基;秦云;;政治關(guān)聯(lián)對中小企業(yè)并購績效的影響——基于產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)與制度環(huán)境的視角[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治論壇;2014年06期

8 彭娟;楊赫;;弱周期性行業(yè)盈利穩(wěn)定性和企業(yè)成長性的實證分析——基于醫(yī)藥和食品行業(yè)的數(shù)據(jù)研究[J];上海管理科學(xué);2014年03期

9 覃舜宜;劉蘇;;構(gòu)建市場化并購重組制度[J];中國金融;2014年07期

10 陳仕華;姜廣省;盧昌崇;;董事聯(lián)結(jié)、目標公司選擇與并購績效——基于并購雙方之間信息不對稱的研究視角[J];管理世界;2013年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 段瓊芳;創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司購并的驅(qū)動因素及其對績效的影響研究[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2014年

2 吳茜茜;中國企業(yè)跨國并購績效實證研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1365885