發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-02-22 11:15

【摘要】：“國(guó)朝文派”是金代文學(xué)的核心和元代文學(xué)發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)。它的出現(xiàn)標(biāo)志著金代文學(xué)以獨(dú)立的姿態(tài)出現(xiàn)在中國(guó)文學(xué)史上。本文從元好問(wèn)重申的“國(guó)朝文派”的概念入手,將金代文學(xué)還原重置于從宋金對(duì)峙至蒙古崛起的文學(xué)生態(tài)之下,以文學(xué)自身發(fā)展的規(guī)律為經(jīng),以北方少數(shù)民族政權(quán)統(tǒng)治下的文化特征為緯,探求“國(guó)朝文派”的形成發(fā)展規(guī)律和文學(xué)價(jià)值。第一部分,首先對(duì)“國(guó)朝文派”的概念及內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了界定,其所反映的金代大民族觀和文學(xué)獨(dú)立意識(shí)尤其值得重視。“國(guó)朝文派”并不是一個(gè)傳統(tǒng)意義上的文學(xué)流派的稱(chēng)謂,它是由金代人自覺(jué)提出的,具有存史意義的文學(xué)稱(chēng)謂。它是金人對(duì)于本朝文學(xué)發(fā)展規(guī)律和特征的自我總結(jié)。它以傳統(tǒng)的詩(shī)文作品為對(duì)象,以土生土長(zhǎng)的金朝人為主體,以儒家文統(tǒng)為規(guī)范,結(jié)合北方區(qū)域文化,形成了金代詩(shī)文特有風(fēng)骨和神韻。簡(jiǎn)言之,“國(guó)朝文派”就是金代詩(shī)文區(qū)別于其它朝代的文學(xué)特色的統(tǒng)稱(chēng)。其次,對(duì)“國(guó)朝文派”的創(chuàng)作主體及其特征進(jìn)行了概括和總結(jié)。“國(guó)朝文派”的創(chuàng)作主體是金朝土生土長(zhǎng),本土培養(yǎng)的,科舉進(jìn)士出身為主,具有較高文化藝術(shù)修養(yǎng)的高級(jí)知識(shí)分子。他們以漢族為主,也有少數(shù)其他民族的杰出作家。他們都與傳統(tǒng)的漢文化保持著深刻的聯(lián)系,其中家學(xué)淵源成為主要的途徑之一。與宋朝的文人地位相比,女真政權(quán)下金朝漢族文人的政治地位明顯下降,但他們卻擔(dān)負(fù)起了發(fā)展金代文學(xué)的重任。金末詩(shī)人元好問(wèn)將其稱(chēng)為“國(guó)朝文派”。第二部分對(duì)“國(guó)朝文派”的發(fā)展演變進(jìn)行了研究。主要以金代“國(guó)朝文派”文學(xué)觀念的萌發(fā)、成熟,新變和最終確立為核心,按照時(shí)間順序,從各個(gè)時(shí)期的文學(xué)生態(tài)、文學(xué)特征、代表作家入手,研究總結(jié)“國(guó)朝文派”發(fā)展演變的規(guī)律。第三部分主要從金代少數(shù)民族政權(quán)下的特殊文化的角度進(jìn)行研究。金代是少數(shù)民族建立的政權(quán),其特殊的文化生態(tài)對(duì)文學(xué)產(chǎn)生重要的影響。少數(shù)民族的文化習(xí)俗、科舉制度、宗教觀念等都是影響金代文學(xué)品格的重要因素。總之,“國(guó)朝文派”是金代文學(xué)的特稱(chēng),是金人對(duì)文學(xué)獨(dú)立性的自覺(jué)追求。通過(guò)研究“國(guó)朝文派”的形成發(fā)展過(guò)程,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)文學(xué)總是處于一個(gè)如何繼承前代文學(xué)遺產(chǎn),以及結(jié)合自身時(shí)代特色尋求文學(xué)上的突破的過(guò)程。不同時(shí)代文學(xué)品格的不同,既是時(shí)代特征賦予的,又是文人們積極探索追求的結(jié)果�！皣�(guó)朝文派”作為金代文學(xué)的重要組成部分,上承北宋,下啟蒙元,具有重要的意義和研究?jī)r(jià)值。
[Abstract]:The style of the Guo Dynasty is the core of the literature of Jin Dynasty and the foundation of the development of literature of Yuan Dynasty. Its appearance marks the independent appearance of Jin Dynasty literature in the history of Chinese literature. This article starts with the concept of "GuoChao School", which is reiterated by Yuan Hao-wen, restores the literature of Jin Dynasty to the literary ecology from the confrontation of Song and Jin dynasties to the rise of Mongolia, and takes the law of literature's own development as its classics. Taking the cultural characteristics under the rule of the northern minority political power as the weft, this paper explores the formation and development law and literary value of the literary school of the National Dynasty. In the first part, we define the concept and connotation of "GuoChao School", which reflects the great national view and literary independence consciousness of Jin Dynasty. "the literary school of the Guo Dynasty" is not a term of the literary school in the traditional sense, it is put forward by the people of Jin Dynasty consciously, has the historical significance literature appellation. It is the Jin Dynasty literature development law and characteristics of self-summary. It takes the traditional poetry and prose works as the object, takes the native Jin Dynasty people as the main body, takes the Confucian literary system as the norm, unifies the northern region culture, has formed the Jin Dynasty poetry unique strength and the charm. In short, the style of the Guo Dynasty is the general term of the literary features of the Jin Dynasty and the other dynasties. Secondly, the author generalizes and summarizes the creative subject and characteristics of Guo-Chao School. The main body of the creation of the literary school of the National Dynasty is the senior intellectual who was born and bred locally in the Jin Dynasty, mainly from the imperial examination scholars, with higher cultural and artistic accomplishment. They are mainly Han nationality, but also have a few outstanding writers of other nationalities. They are deeply connected with the traditional Chinese culture, among which the family origin is one of the main ways. Compared with the status of the literati in the Song Dynasty, the political status of the Han literati in the Jin Dynasty was obviously decreased under the Nuzhen regime, but they took on the important task of developing the literature of the Jin Dynasty. Yuan Hao-wen, the poet of the late Jin Dynasty, called it "the style of the National Dynasty". In the second part, the author studies the development and evolution of the style of Guo Dynasty. Mainly taking the germination, maturity, new change and final establishment of the literary ideas of the "National Dynasty" in the Jin Dynasty as the core, starting from the literary ecology and characteristics of each period, according to the time order, it represents the writers. This paper studies and summarizes the law of the development and evolution of the style of the Guo Dynasty. The third part mainly carries on the research from the special culture angle under the Jin Dynasty minority regime. Jin Dynasty is a political power established by ethnic minorities, and its special cultural ecology has an important influence on literature. The cultural customs, imperial examination system and religious concepts of ethnic minorities are the important factors affecting the literary character of Jin Dynasty. In a word, the style of the Guo Dynasty is the special name of the literature of Jin Dynasty, and it is the conscious pursuit of the literary independence of the Jin people. Through the study of the formation and development of the "GuoChao Literary School", we find that literature is always in a process of how to inherit the literary heritage of the previous generation and how to seek a breakthrough in literature in combination with its own characteristics of the times. The difference of literary character in different times is not only endowed by the characteristics of the times, but also the result of the literati's active exploration and pursuit. As an important part of the literature of the Jin Dynasty, the style of the Guo Dynasty is of great significance and research value to the Northern Song Dynasty and the Lower Enlightenment Yuan Dynasty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I206.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 延保全;王琳;;試論文學(xué)“流動(dòng)空間”的建構(gòu)——以金宋文學(xué)為例[J];民族文學(xué)研究;2016年04期

2 胡傳志;;論金代詩(shī)學(xué)批評(píng)形式的新變[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

3 狄寶心;;宇文虛中詩(shī)中的人生價(jià)值取向及其死因索評(píng)[J];民族文學(xué)研究;2016年01期

4 沈文雪;;金源尚文崇儒與國(guó)朝文派的崛起[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2014年04期

5 鄧富華;;元好問(wèn)與江西詩(shī)派[J];民族文學(xué)研究;2014年03期

6 閆興潘;;金代翰林學(xué)士院與史學(xué)關(guān)系之演變及其影響[J];史學(xué)史研究;2013年03期

7 閆興潘;;翰林學(xué)士院與皇權(quán)的距離:金末益政院設(shè)立的制度史意義[J];北方民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

8 劉淮南;;元好問(wèn)《論詩(shī)三十首》中評(píng)蘇詩(shī)的問(wèn)題[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?2012年02期

9 牛貴琥;秦琰;;論金代文學(xué)的敘事性與俗化傾向[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

10 張文澍;;國(guó)可亡而史不可滅——論元遺山治史之文學(xué)方法[J];民族文學(xué)研究;2011年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 孫宏哲;金代詩(shī)文與佛禪研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

2 劉雄;陳與義詩(shī)歌研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2013年

3 王昕;趙秉文研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

4 李克建;儒家民族觀的形成與發(fā)展[D];西南民族大學(xué);2008年

5 龍小松;沖突與融合——金代文化的變遷[D];浙江大學(xué);2008年

6 楊忠謙;大定詩(shī)壇研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

7 沈文雪;宋金文學(xué)整合研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2006年

8 胡淑慧;遼金元文學(xué)構(gòu)成的新主體[D];浙江大學(xué);2005年

9 李藝;金代詞人群體研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2002年

10 文師華;金元詩(shī)學(xué)理論研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 胡文川;李純甫怪奇詩(shī)風(fēng)的內(nèi)涵及形成原因[D];山西大學(xué);2011年

2 曹煥煥;李俊民詩(shī)歌研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

3 張懷宇;王寂詩(shī)歌研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2008年

4 聶立申;金朝黨懷英研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

5 曾定華;蔡松年研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2007年

6 趙忠敏;金元之際東平文人群體研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2007年

7 邵鴻雁;金遺民詞研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

8 王萬(wàn)志;金代山西區(qū)域文化[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

9 李定乾;《滹南遺老集》研究[D];安徽師范大學(xué);2005年

10 談生廣;從王庭筠《墨竹枯槎圖》看宋金及元初蘇軾體系墨竹的傳承[D];南京師范大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：2428164