發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-30 19:51

【摘要】：尋根文學(xué)是二十世紀(jì)八十年代文學(xué)一個(gè)繞不開(kāi)的話題,目前學(xué)界較少?gòu)拿袼捉嵌妊芯繉じ�小說(shuō),這種角度能更好地理解尋根文學(xué)尋找民族文化之根的原因,也能夠更好地體會(huì)尋根小說(shuō)的獨(dú)特魅力。本文力圖利用文藝民俗學(xué)、文學(xué)人類學(xué)等多種理論對(duì)尋根小說(shuō)進(jìn)行研讀。論述從尋根小說(shuō)思維方式、敘述方式、語(yǔ)言及與五四鄉(xiāng)土小說(shuō)的關(guān)系等方面深入挖掘與梳理尋根小說(shuō),分析民俗與尋根小說(shuō)之間的關(guān)系,期待引起更多的人對(duì)民俗重視起來(lái),展示曾被忽略的尋根風(fēng)采。全文由緒論、正文、結(jié)語(yǔ)構(gòu)成。其中緒論論述了從民俗學(xué)研究尋根文學(xué)的意義;說(shuō)明了選題的研究現(xiàn)狀并對(duì)論述中的基本概念進(jìn)行了闡釋;一直以來(lái)關(guān)于尋根小說(shuō)的范圍學(xué)界沒(méi)有定論,在這一部分本文通過(guò)梳理一些重要的尋根文學(xué)文獻(xiàn)對(duì)該問(wèn)題提出自己的看法;最后說(shuō)明了研究思路。正文共分四章,第一章論述尋根小說(shuō)創(chuàng)作思維方式的轉(zhuǎn)換問(wèn)題,通過(guò)對(duì)尋根小說(shuō)中有形物質(zhì)民俗生活相的挖掘,說(shuō)明尋根小說(shuō)從革命、政治話語(yǔ)向日常生活移行;通過(guò)對(duì)小說(shuō)中原始巫術(shù)、宗教等民俗生活相的論述說(shuō)明尋根小說(shuō)對(duì)原始思維的認(rèn)同;最后指出一些尋根小說(shuō)中的民俗生活相過(guò)于舊怪假,提出尋根小說(shuō)同反思文學(xué)和改革文學(xué)相比較重新把審丑納入文學(xué)領(lǐng)域。第二章論述尋根小說(shuō)的敘述方式,分析尋根小說(shuō)中的民俗故事,說(shuō)明小說(shuō)是如何化用這些故事建構(gòu)了傳奇性的;分析小說(shuō)中的民俗糾葛是如何架構(gòu)起情節(jié)沖突的;最后分析這些民俗背景凸顯了小說(shuō)中的人物身上野性的生命。正是由于民俗的加入使得尋根小說(shuō)完成了從意義文本到故事文本的回歸。第三章論述尋根小說(shuō)的民間語(yǔ)言,尋根小說(shuō)中有著大量的方言、口語(yǔ)、民間歌謠和諺語(yǔ),通過(guò)對(duì)這些語(yǔ)言的分析提出尋根小說(shuō)試圖利用民間語(yǔ)言將小說(shuō)的敘述語(yǔ)言從政治話語(yǔ)中心逃離。第四章討論五四鄉(xiāng)土小說(shuō)與尋根小說(shuō)在民俗追尋上的異同。這一章共分三節(jié),第一節(jié)分析了在對(duì)待啟蒙的態(tài)度上五四鄉(xiāng)土小說(shuō)傾向于單一的批判,尋根小說(shuō)有了更多的思辨色彩;第二節(jié)辨析了在創(chuàng)作主體的民俗文化構(gòu)成上,前者更豐厚而后者相對(duì)欠缺;第三節(jié)論述文本中婚俗的呈現(xiàn)方式上一個(gè)重寫實(shí)一個(gè)重象征。最后以民族、國(guó)家與文學(xué)話語(yǔ)為結(jié)從宏觀角度審視尋根小說(shuō)的歷史意義。
[Abstract]:Root-seeking literature is an inextricable topic in literature in the 1980s. At present, scholars seldom study root-seeking novels from the perspective of folklore. This angle can better understand the reasons why root-seeking literature seeks the root of national culture, and can also better understand the unique charm of root-seeking novels. This paper tries to study the root-seeking novels by using many theories, such as literary folklore, literary anthropology and so on. This paper discusses how to excavate and sort out the root-seeking novels from the aspects of thinking mode, narrative mode, language and the relationship with the May 4th local novels, analyzes the relationship between folklore and root-seeking novels, and expects to cause more people to pay attention to folklore and show the root-seeking style that has been ignored. The full text is composed of introduction, main body and conclusion. The introduction discusses the significance of the study of root-seeking literature from folklore; explains the research status of the topic and explains the basic concepts in the discussion; there has been no conclusion about the scope of root-seeking novels. In this part, this paper puts forward its own views on this issue by combing some important root-seeking literature; finally, it explains the research ideas. The main body is divided into four chapters. The first chapter discusses the transformation of the thinking mode of root-seeking novels, explains the migration of root-seeking novels from revolution and political discourse to daily life through the excavation of tangible material folk life in root-seeking novels, and explains the identity of root-seeking novels to primitive thinking through the discussion of primitive witchcraft, religion and other folk life in the novels. Finally, it points out that the folk life in some root-seeking novels is too old and strange, and puts forward that the root-seeking novels bring ugliness into the field of literature again compared with reflective literature and reform literature. The second chapter discusses the narrative mode of root-seeking novels, analyzes the folk stories in root-seeking novels, and explains how the novels use these stories to construct the legend; analyzes how the folk entanglement in the novel constructs the plot conflict; and finally analyzes these folk background highlights the wild life of the characters in the novel. It is precisely because of the addition of folklore that the root-seeking novel has completed the return from the meaning text to the story text. The third chapter discusses the folk language of root-seeking novels, in which there are a large number of dialects, spoken languages, folk ballads and proverbs. Through the analysis of these languages, this paper puts forward that root-seeking novels try to escape the narrative language of novels from the center of political discourse by using folk language. The fourth chapter discusses the similarities and differences between May 4th local novels and root-seeking novels in folk pursuit. This chapter is divided into three sections. The first section analyzes that the May 4th local novels tend to be a single criticism in the attitude towards enlightenment, and the root-seeking novels have more speculative colors; the second section distinguishes the composition of the folk culture of the creative subject, the former is more rich and the latter is relatively deficient; the third section discusses a restatement of the presentation of marriage customs in the text. Finally, the historical significance of root-seeking novels is examined from a macro point of view based on nation, state and literary discourse.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：I207.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡翔;詰問(wèn)和懷疑[J];當(dāng)代作家評(píng)論;1993年06期

2 張承志;;歷史與心史——讀《元朝秘史》隨想[J];讀書(shū);1985年09期

3 陳平原;;文化·尋根·語(yǔ)碼[J];讀書(shū);1986年01期

4 陳思和;中國(guó)新文學(xué)對(duì)文化傳統(tǒng)的認(rèn)識(shí)及其演變[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1986年03期

5 張清華;歷史神話的傳論和話語(yǔ)革命的開(kāi)端──重評(píng)尋根文學(xué)思潮[J];山東師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年06期

6 李慶西;;李慶西評(píng)論小輯(一)新筆記小說(shuō):尋根派,也是先鋒派[J];上海文學(xué);1987年01期

7 李銳;;《厚土》自語(yǔ)[J];上海文學(xué);1988年10期

8 韓少功;;杭州會(huì)議前后[J];上海文學(xué);2001年02期

9 張法;百年文學(xué)三次轉(zhuǎn)型淺議[J];天津社會(huì)科學(xué);1998年01期

10 周介人;;文學(xué)探討的當(dāng)代意識(shí)背景[J];文學(xué)自由談;1986年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周引莉;從“尋根文學(xué)”到“后尋根文學(xué)”[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2508202