發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-12 19:04

  本文選題：文學(xué)研究 + 后理論�。� 參考：《江蘇大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2016年01期

【摘要】：無論是文學(xué)理論、理論還是后理論,都涉及理論與文學(xué)研究的關(guān)系這一根本問題。近年來,文學(xué)理論界圍繞"后理論"掀起了討論熱潮,形成了話語生產(chǎn)醒目的景觀。不應(yīng)忽視的是,后理論有著諸多不同的取徑:以為理論終結(jié)乃至可以棄絕理論者有之,主張理論因散布而取得成功者有之,強(qiáng)調(diào)理論回歸文學(xué)者有之,張揚(yáng)理論的反思與多元者亦有之,如此等等。對(duì)于后理論存在分歧的多重意味及各自的內(nèi)部構(gòu)成,應(yīng)予具體分析,區(qū)別對(duì)待。
[Abstract]:Both literary theory, theory and post-theory involve the fundamental question of the relationship between theory and literary research.In recent years, literature theorists have set off an upsurge of discussion around post-theory, forming an eye-catching landscape of discourse production.It should not be ignored that there are many different approaches to post theory: those who believe that the theory is over or even can be rejected, those who claim that the theory is successful because of its dissemination, and those who emphasize the return of the theory to literature.The reflection and pluralism of Zhang Yang's theory also exist, and so on.It should be analyzed and treated differently for the multiple meanings of differences in post theory and their internal composition.
【作者單位】： 福建社會(huì)科學(xué)院文學(xué)所;
【分類號(hào)】：I0
，

本文編號(hào)：1741021