發(fā)布時間：2018-05-16 19:32

  本文選題：檢察官 + 出庭�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：公訴是檢察院的基本職能之一，而出庭則是實現(xiàn)這種職能的最直接方式，因此無論是在刑事普通程序中，還是在刑事簡易程序中，檢察官都應(yīng)出庭支持公訴。自2012年《刑事訴訟法》實施以來，基層檢察院在派員出庭簡易程序的基礎(chǔ)上，不斷探索出庭模式，取得了較好的效果。但實踐中仍然存在一些問題，為了既公正又效率的完成檢察官出庭簡易程序的公訴任務(wù)，仍需對此項內(nèi)容作進(jìn)一步完善。 除引言外，正文分為四部分，共三萬三千余字。 第一部分，檢察官出庭簡易程序的流變與意義。首先，在立法上，我國刑事訴訟法經(jīng)過兩次修改，對于檢察官出庭簡易程序的內(nèi)容作了較大的調(diào)整，實現(xiàn)了簡易程序從無到有的突破，確立了檢察官從可以不出庭到必須出庭的模式。其次，在司法實踐中，過去對于簡單、輕微的刑事案件，檢察院往往不派員出席法庭，而修法后，各地基層檢察院積極落實法律規(guī)定，并結(jié)合本院實際探索出了一些檢察官出庭刑事簡易程序的模式。最后，檢察院出庭簡易程序有著十分重要的意義，體現(xiàn)在它符合程序正義的要求，是檢察官履行職責(zé)的需要，有利于保障訴訟參與人的合法權(quán)益并有利于實現(xiàn)普法教育功能。 第二部分，檢察官出庭簡易程序的步驟環(huán)節(jié)與比較。首先，雖然我國簡易程序的簡化主要體現(xiàn)在審判階段，但是簡易程序能否真正實現(xiàn)公正與效率的結(jié)合，離不開檢察官職能的發(fā)揮。一般而言，一個案件能否適用簡易程序?qū)徟�，絕大多數(shù)在審查起訴階段就基本上確定了。因此，檢察官出庭簡易程序的步驟環(huán)節(jié)應(yīng)當(dāng)包括庭前的準(zhǔn)備階段、庭審階段和庭后的監(jiān)督階段。其次，檢察官出庭簡易程序與檢察官出庭普通程序雖然在程序和內(nèi)容上有相同之處，但在審批程序、適用對象、適用級別等方面有很大不同。最后，與域外檢察官出庭簡易程序的相比，雖然中外簡易程序都重視檢察官的直接參與，都注重審檢認(rèn)定的一致性，但中外檢察官對簡易程序的選擇權(quán)和檢察官在簡易程序中的地位存在較大差異。因此面對實踐中出現(xiàn)的問題，應(yīng)主要從我國的實踐出發(fā)尋找解決措施，而不是簡單的借鑒域外經(jīng)驗。 第三部分，檢察官出庭簡易程序存在的問題。從實務(wù)上來看，檢察院派員出席法庭支持公訴已經(jīng)不再是個問題，但是在檢察官出庭簡易程序的過程中，仍存在檢察官出庭簡易程序模式混亂、履行告知義務(wù)不細(xì)致、出庭形式化以及辦理簡易程序案件不簡易等現(xiàn)象。 第四部分，完善我國檢察官出庭簡易程序案件的建議。為了有效彌補(bǔ)實踐中檢察官出庭簡易程序的不足，促進(jìn)檢察院公訴工作的健康發(fā)展，除了從人力、物力、財力等方面給予充分保障外，，針對檢察官出庭簡易程序存在的問題，提出解決措施。首先，通過創(chuàng)新案件的處理方式和推廣先進(jìn)的出庭方式促進(jìn)出庭模式的完善。其次，檢察官切實履行庭前告知義務(wù)。再次，檢察官應(yīng)正確認(rèn)識簡易程序的作用，并通過改進(jìn)量刑建議權(quán)和改進(jìn)公訴教育職能，切實避免出庭形式化。最后，通過簡化訴訟文書和部分程序提高檢察官辦案速度。
[Abstract]:Public prosecution is one of the basic functions of the procuratorate, and appearing in court is the most direct way to realize this function. Therefore, the prosecutor should appear in court to support public prosecution in both criminal procedure and criminal summary procedure. Since the implementation of the criminal procedure law in 2012, the grass-roots procuratorate has been on the basis of the summary procedure of police officers appearing in court. There are still some problems in practice, but there are still some problems in practice. In order to complete the prosecution task of the prosecutor's summary procedure, it still needs to be further improved.
Besides the introduction, the text is divided into four parts, with a total of 33000 words.
The first part is the rheology and significance of the summary procedure of the prosecutor appearing in court. First, in legislation, the criminal procedure law of our country has made a great adjustment to the contents of the summary procedure of the prosecutor's appearance in court after two revisions, which has realized the breakthrough of the summary procedure and established the mode of the prosecutor from not appearing in court to the court. Secondly, In the judicial practice, in the past, the procuratorate often did not send members to the court for simple and minor criminal cases. After the law, the grass-roots procuratorates all over the country have actively implemented the legal provisions, and explored the pattern of the criminal summary procedure of the prosecutors in court. Finally, the summary procedure of the Procuratorate's appearance in court has a very important significance. It is reflected in the requirements of procedural justice, the need for prosecutors to perform their duties, to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the participants in the litigation and to realize the function of the universal legal education.
The second part is the step link and comparison of the summary procedure of the prosecutor in court. First, although the simplification of the summary procedure in China is mainly reflected in the trial stage, whether the summary procedure can truly realize the combination of justice and efficiency can not be separated from the function of the prosecutor. In general, a case can be applied to the trial of summary procedure, the vast majority of them are in the case. The stage of the examination and prosecution is basically determined. Therefore, the steps of the prosecutor's summary procedure should include the preparatory stage before the court, the trial stage and the supervision stage after the court. Secondly, the general procedure of the prosecutor's summary procedure and the general procedure of the prosecutor appearing in court will have the same in the procedure and content, but in the examination and approval procedure, the applicable object, There are great differences in the application level and other aspects. Finally, compared with the summary procedure of the extraterritorial public prosecutors, although both Chinese and foreign simple procedures attach importance to the direct participation of the prosecutor, they all pay attention to the consistency of the examination and identification, but there is a great difference between the Chinese and foreign prosecutors' choice of the summary procedure and the status of the prosecutor in the simple procedure. Problems in practice should be solved mainly from the practice of our country, rather than simply drawing on extraterritorial experience.
The third part is the problem of the summary procedure of the prosecutor appearing in court. In practice, it is no longer a problem for the procurator to attend the court to support the public prosecution. But in the process of the summary procedure of the prosecutor's appearance, there is still a confusion of the simple procedure mode of the prosecutor's appearance in court, the fulfillment of the informing obligation, the formalization of the appearance of the court and the simple handling of the procedure. Procedural cases are not simple and so on.
The fourth part is to improve the proposal of the case of the summary procedure of the prosecutor in our country. In order to make up for the shortage of the summary procedure of the prosecutor in practice and promote the healthy development of the procuratorate public prosecution work, in addition to the full guarantee of the human, material and financial resources, this paper puts forward the solutions to the problems existing in the summary procedure of the prosecutor appearing in court. First, through the treatment of innovative cases and the promotion of the advanced appearance of the court to promote the perfection of the appearance of the appearance of the court. Secondly, the prosecutor conscientiously fulfil the pre Court Notification Obligation. Again, the prosecutor should correctly understand the role of the summary procedure, and by improving the right of sentencing proposal and the improvement of the public prosecution education function, the formalization of the court should be avoided. Finally, the public prosecutor will avoid the formalization of the court. Simplifying litigation documents and partial procedures to improve the speed of handling cases by prosecutors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 高一飛;;刑事簡易程序?qū)徟兄袡z察制度的完善[J];河北法學(xué);2007年07期

2 李昌林;;對抗制·羈押率·簡易程序適用率——刑事訴訟法再修改研究中的流行誤區(qū)剖析[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年03期

3 王沿琰;王昕;錢小軍;;刑事簡易程序制度模式研究[J];人民檢察;2013年12期

4 孫長永;沉默權(quán)的是非之爭與正當(dāng)根據(jù)(上)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2001年03期

5 高一飛;不能簡化的權(quán)利——評刑事簡易程序中的國際人權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年04期

6 孫長永;試論“普通程序簡化審”[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2001年12期

7 孫長永;珍視正當(dāng)程序,拒絕辯訴交易[J];政法論壇;2002年06期

8 陳衛(wèi)東;公正和效率——我國刑事審判程序改革的兩個目標(biāo)[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報;2001年05期

本文編號：1898129