發(fā)布時間：2018-05-17 06:06

  本文選題：刑事訴訟 + 專家輔助人��； 參考：《山東大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：2012年修正的《刑事訴訟法》在第192條確立了專家輔助人制度,此制度的出臺有著其深刻的社會背景和巨大的制度意義。專家輔助人的出現(xiàn),不僅順應了當前刑事案件科學證據(jù)盛行的趨勢,而且其通過協(xié)助控辯雙方對鑒定意見這一法定證據(jù)類型的質證,可以有效彌補我國現(xiàn)今司法鑒定制度的缺陷,實現(xiàn)刑事訴訟的公正價值和效率價值,從而幫助法官準確認定案件事實,作出公正審判。遺憾的是,法律規(guī)定的相對模糊、相關制度的不完善、理論界和實務界對于相關法律和司法解釋理解的分歧,使得對于專家輔助人制度的相關內容遠未達到共識,這導致在司法實踐中此制度的運行并不順利。如何將專家輔助人制度的訴訟價值充分發(fā)揮,解決實踐過程中遇到的問題以及完善此制度是本文著重研究的內容。筆者采用比較研究法、實證研究法等,在明確相關概念和專家輔助人制度基本內容的基礎之上,以刑事訴訟專家輔助人第一案、復旦投毒案和福建念斌案為樣本,探討此制度所創(chuàng)設的現(xiàn)實背景和價值意義,分析此制度在司法實踐中的運行樣態(tài),以此研究專家輔助人制度在刑事訴訟中面臨的困境和完善路徑,并推動制度的進一步發(fā)展。文章共分為四個部分：一、刑事訴訟中專家輔助人制度的概念界定和基本內容。分析了專家輔助人這一概念的內涵,明確了在現(xiàn)有法律體系下專家輔助人制度的基本內容。二、我國專家輔助人制度確立的現(xiàn)實背景與訴訟價值。本部分從專家輔助人制度所確立的現(xiàn)實依據(jù)以及其制度意義出發(fā),明確了此制度設立的迫切性和必要性。三、專家輔助人制度的理論爭議與實踐問題。明確專家輔助人制度運行的基本理論爭議和解決此制度在司法實踐運行過程中所面臨的具體性問題,從而充分發(fā)揮此制度的價值功用。四、專家輔助人制度的完善。通過法律、司法解釋的不斷健全和相關配套制度的建立,促進專家輔助人制度的不斷發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The "Criminal Procedure Law" amended in 2012 has established the expert assistant system in the 192nd article. The introduction of this system has its profound social background and great institutional significance. The emergence of the expert assistants not only complies with the trend of the current scientific evidence of criminal cases, but also passes through the legal certificate that assists both the prosecution and the defense. According to the type of certificate, it can effectively make up the defects of our present judicial authentication system, realize the fair value and efficiency value of the criminal procedure, thus help the judge to identify the facts of the case and make a fair trial. Unfortunately, the legal provisions are relatively vague, the relevant system is not perfect, the theorists and the practical circles have related laws and departments to the relevant laws and departments. The interpretation of the differences of understanding makes the relevant content of the expert assistant system far from consensus, which leads to the operation of the system in judicial practice is not smooth. How to give full play to the litigation value of the expert assistant system and solve the problems encountered in the practice process and improve the system is the content of this paper. On the basis of the relevant concepts and the basic contents of the expert assistant system, the author uses the comparative research method and the empirical research method to discuss the actual background and value meaning created by the system in the case of the first case of criminal procedure experts, Fudan poisoning case and Fujian Bin Bin case, and analyzes the operation of this system in judicial practice. In order to study the predicament and the perfect path of the expert assistant system in criminal proceedings and promote the further development of the system, the article is divided into four parts: first, the definition and basic content of the expert assistant system in the criminal procedure. The basic content of the system of expert assistants. Two, the realistic background and litigation value of the establishment of the expert assistant system in China. This part makes clear the urgency and necessity of the establishment of this system from the basis of the realistic basis established by the expert assistant system and its institutional significance. Three, the theoretical dispute and practice of the expert assistant system. To clarify the basic theoretical disputes of the operation of the expert assistant system and to solve the specific problems faced by the system in the process of judicial practice, so as to give full play to the value function of the system. Four, the perfection of the expert assistant system. The continuous development of the system of helping people.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉寧;商輔助人探析[J];呂梁高等專科學校學報;2004年03期

2 莫于川;;從專家輔助人制度看司法潮流[J];人民檢察;2006年21期

3 張善q，

本文編號：1900224