發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-09 19:47

【摘要】：目前,醫(yī)療整容事故呈上升趨勢(shì),但國(guó)內(nèi)尚未有相關(guān)法律規(guī)定對(duì)其進(jìn)行規(guī)制,學(xué)界亦對(duì)在此過(guò)程中產(chǎn)生的民事法律責(zé)任性質(zhì)、責(zé)任認(rèn)定、責(zé)任承擔(dān)眾說(shuō)紛紜,究其深層原因主要有醫(yī)源性和非醫(yī)源性因素、主觀和客觀方面、業(yè)內(nèi)和業(yè)外、體制性和非體制性等多種因素。醫(yī)療整容機(jī)構(gòu)應(yīng)如何承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任、所承擔(dān)得民事責(zé)任性質(zhì)如何界定,如何均衡保護(hù)整容者合法權(quán)益都是是理論界及實(shí)務(wù)界有待解決的問(wèn)題。醫(yī)療整容不同于傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)療以診治為目的,其是在身體健康的狀況下為尋求精神享樂(lè)而進(jìn)行的整容手術(shù)的行為。我國(guó)衛(wèi)生部出臺(tái)的《醫(yī)療美容服務(wù)管理辦法》對(duì)醫(yī)療整容機(jī)構(gòu)創(chuàng)設(shè)需具備的資質(zhì)及職業(yè)人員需具備的資質(zhì)進(jìn)行規(guī)范,但對(duì)醫(yī)療整容事故產(chǎn)生糾紛解決僅以"按照國(guó)家有關(guān)規(guī)定處理"一言以概之,造成眾多同案不同判的結(jié)果。本文以醫(yī)療整容事故民事責(zé)任研究為方向,主要對(duì)醫(yī)療整容行為的基本理論、醫(yī)療整容事故的民事責(zé)任構(gòu)成、醫(yī)療整容事故的民事責(zé)任認(rèn)定、醫(yī)療整容事故的民事責(zé)任承擔(dān)等幾個(gè)方面的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析論證,并針對(duì)醫(yī)療整容事故中出現(xiàn)的民事責(zé)任及相關(guān)法律規(guī)定中存在的問(wèn)題提出自己的見(jiàn)解及建議。全文共分為四個(gè)部分:引言。對(duì)在實(shí)踐中醫(yī)療整容事故糾紛處理存在的問(wèn)題及其研究目的進(jìn)行論述。第一部分,醫(yī)療整容行為與醫(yī)療整容事故概述。通過(guò)解析傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)療行為、普通醫(yī)療事故,以期對(duì)醫(yī)療整容行為、醫(yī)療整容事故及醫(yī)療整容事故法律關(guān)系進(jìn)行界定,并就目前我國(guó)醫(yī)療整容市場(chǎng)亂象問(wèn)題,指出醫(yī)療整容事故糾紛高發(fā)的原因。同時(shí),通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)外及國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)行法律的概述,評(píng)析我國(guó)現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律在處理醫(yī)療整容糾紛民事責(zé)任問(wèn)題的不足。第二部分,醫(yī)療整容事故責(zé)任類型。關(guān)于責(zé)任類型,筆者較為認(rèn)同醫(yī)療整容事故為違約與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合,根據(jù)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律規(guī)定賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的不同,整容者更傾向于提出侵權(quán)之訴,以期使其損害得到最大補(bǔ)償。筆者認(rèn)為此種狀況具有不合理之處,望能通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)法律的解析,而平衡此現(xiàn)象。第三部分,責(zé)任認(rèn)定及責(zé)任承擔(dān)。對(duì)于醫(yī)療整容事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定,筆者認(rèn)為在責(zé)任主體上應(yīng)區(qū)分合法與非法醫(yī)療整容機(jī)構(gòu);歸責(zé)原則上采用過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則與無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則相結(jié)合。對(duì)于責(zé)任承擔(dān),筆者認(rèn)為由于醫(yī)療整容事故的特殊性,其賠償范圍應(yīng)包括物質(zhì)賠償與精神賠償。此外,精神賠償應(yīng)取得格外重視。第四部分,醫(yī)療整容事故的民事法律責(zé)任制度完善。主要從完善相關(guān)法律、法規(guī);相關(guān)合同內(nèi)容的完善;建立醫(yī)療整容保險(xiǎn)制度;司法鑒定制度的完善四個(gè)方面予以闡述。
[Abstract]:At present, the medical cosmetic accident is on the rise, but there are no relevant laws to regulate it. The academic circles also have different opinions on the nature of the civil legal liability arising in this process, the recognition of the liability, and the assumption of the responsibility, and there are different opinions on the nature of the civil legal liability arising in this process. The underlying causes include iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic factors, subjective and objective factors, industry and out-of-industry, institutional and non-institutional factors. How to assume the civil liability, how to define the nature of the civil liability and how to balance the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the cosmetic operators are the problems to be solved in the field of theory and practice. Medical cosmetic surgery is different from traditional medicine for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment. It is the behavior of cosmetic surgery in order to seek spiritual pleasure under the condition of physical health. The measures for the Administration of Medical Beauty Services issued by the Ministry of Health of our country regulate the qualifications required for the creation of medical cosmetic surgery institutions and the qualifications required for professional personnel. However, the dispute resolution of medical cosmetic accident is only "dealt with in accordance with the relevant regulations of the state", resulting in the result of many different judgments in the same case. This article takes the medical cosmetic accident civil liability research as the direction, mainly to the medical cosmetic surgery behavior basic theory, the medical cosmetic accident civil liability constitution, the medical cosmetic accident civil liability determination, This paper analyzes and demonstrates the problems of the civil liability of medical cosmetic surgery accident, and puts forward some opinions and suggestions on the civil liability of the medical cosmetic accident and the problems existing in the related laws and regulations. The full text is divided into four parts: introduction. This paper discusses the existing problems and the research purpose of medical cosmetic surgery in practice. The first part is the summary of medical cosmetic surgery behavior and medical cosmetic accident. By analyzing the traditional medical behavior and common medical malpractice, the author hopes to define the legal relationship among the medical cosmetic behavior, the medical cosmetic accident and the medical cosmetic accident, and to discuss the disorderly situation of the medical cosmetic surgery market in our country at present. Pointed out the causes of the high incidence of medical cosmetic accident disputes. At the same time, through the summary of foreign and domestic existing laws, this paper analyzes the shortcomings of the existing laws in dealing with the civil liability of medical cosmetic surgery disputes in China. The second part, medical cosmetic accident liability type. As for the type of liability, the author agrees that medical cosmetic accident is the concurrence of breach of contract and tort liability. According to the different standards of compensation stipulated in the relevant laws of our country, the cosmetic operator is more inclined to bring forward tort action. In order to maximize compensation for its damage. The author believes that this situation is unreasonable, hoping to balance this phenomenon through the analysis of the relevant laws. The third part, responsibility determination and responsibility undertaking. To identify the liability of medical cosmetic surgery accident, the author thinks that the main body of responsibility should be divided into legal and illegal medical cosmetic surgery institutions, and the principle of fault liability and no fault liability should be combined in the principle of imputation. For liability, the author thinks that due to the particularity of medical cosmetic accident, the scope of compensation should include material compensation and spiritual compensation. In addition, spiritual compensation should be paid special attention. The fourth part, the medical cosmetic accident civil legal liability system consummation. Mainly from the perfection of relevant laws and regulations; related contract content improvement; establishment of medical cosmetic insurance system; judicial expertise system to improve four aspects to elaborate.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.16

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 喻景鵬;淺議無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[J];前沿;2005年11期

2 雷群安;;論無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則的理解與適用[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2009年05期

3 柯麗娟;;探討無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則在中國(guó)的發(fā)展[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2010年04期

4 胡志中;李金雙;;淺析無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則在交通事故損害賠償中的適用[J];雞西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

5 陳若詩(shī);;論無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則的存在價(jià)值[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年05期

6 趙亞然;;從案例簡(jiǎn)析過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則和無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年03期

7 王再初;觸電傷亡事故不適用于高壓無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[J];華北電業(yè);2000年10期

8 王再初;觸電傷亡事故不適用高壓無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[J];中國(guó)電力企業(yè)管理;2000年08期

9 翁連金;無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則確立原因透析[J];安徽廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

10 譚兆強(qiáng) ,唐穎玉;我國(guó)法律責(zé)任中是否存在無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[J];中國(guó)律師;2003年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 于文軒;;論環(huán)境保護(hù)基本法的無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[A];環(huán)境法治與建設(shè)和諧社會(huì)——2007年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集（第二冊(cè)）[C];2007年

2 李俊華;陳磊;;建筑物及其他地上物致人損害的侵權(quán)責(zé)任及舉證責(zé)任的分擔(dān)[A];中國(guó)民商法實(shí)務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2002年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 胡森寶;民事無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則淺談[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2013年

2 衛(wèi)愛(ài)民;無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則交通安全的基本保證[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

3 金國(guó)中;撞了不能白撞：無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2003年

4 吳磊;校園事故不宜適用無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2011年

5 李順林;無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則的理解和適用[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2010年

6 本報(bào)記者 孔麗頻;循序漸進(jìn)推進(jìn)強(qiáng)三險(xiǎn)[N];中國(guó)改革報(bào);2005年

7 陳國(guó)平;無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則應(yīng)在法定范圍內(nèi)適用[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2004年

8 ;“強(qiáng)三”險(xiǎn)應(yīng)循序漸進(jìn)[N];上海金融報(bào);2005年

9 胡森寶;無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則存在缺陷[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2014年

10 王旭東;民事侵權(quán)中無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則的法律適用[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王晗;無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

2 顧海舟;論無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

3 黃燕寧;高壓觸電人身侵權(quán)責(zé)任研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2016年

4 于福龍;中美交強(qiáng)險(xiǎn)若干法律問(wèn)題研究[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2016年

5 馬凱麗;醫(yī)療整容事故民事責(zé)任研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2017年

6 胡成立;和諧社會(huì)視野下的無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

7 吳洲平;論無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則在交通事故損害賠償中的適用[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

8 任雅莉;論不明拋擲物致人損害的歸責(zé)原則[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

9 趙博;論侵權(quán)責(zé)任法中的無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則[D];長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

10 朱耀祖;現(xiàn)代侵權(quán)法變革的反思與批判[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2455482