發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-21 21:16

  本文選題：專家 + 卷入水平��； 參考：《山東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：Cuc,Koppel和Hirst(2007)發(fā)現(xiàn)說者的選擇性提取不僅會(huì)導(dǎo)致其出現(xiàn)提取誘發(fā)遺忘效應(yīng),也可能導(dǎo)致聽者出現(xiàn)類似的提取誘發(fā)遺忘效應(yīng),這種發(fā)生在聽者身上的提取誘發(fā)遺忘就被稱為社會(huì)性共同提取誘發(fā)遺忘(SS-RIF,Socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting)。出現(xiàn)SS-RIF的關(guān)鍵在于聽者與說者同時(shí)、隱蔽地共同提取。影響SS-RIF的因素眾多,但存在一些因素,如聽者的監(jiān)測(cè)方式,說者與聽者之間的社會(huì)關(guān)系通過影響聽者同時(shí)提取的程度來影響SSRIF。本研究擬通過三個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)來探討說者的專家性以及聽者的卷入水平不同對(duì)SSRIF的影響。實(shí)驗(yàn)1采用2(說者的專家性:專家vs.非專家)×2(話題的爭議性:爭議話題vs.非爭議話題)×3(提取類型:Rp+、Rp-和Nrp)的三因素混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),其中,提取類型為被試內(nèi)變量,說者的專家性和話題的爭議性為被試間變量,因變量為各類型項(xiàng)目的回憶率。實(shí)驗(yàn)2使用爭議話題作為實(shí)驗(yàn)材料,采用2(說者的專家性:專家vs.非專家)×2(聽者與說者的態(tài)度一致性:一致vs.不一致)×3(提取類型:Rp+、Rp-和Nrp)的三因素混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),聽者與說者態(tài)度的一致性為被試間變量,因變量為各類型項(xiàng)目的回憶率。實(shí)驗(yàn)3設(shè)計(jì)和實(shí)驗(yàn)2相同,不同之處在于選擇性練習(xí)階段開始前,通過情境想象任務(wù)使被試處于高卷入水平。本研究得出結(jié)論如下:(1)對(duì)爭議話題的態(tài)度與說者是否一致會(huì)影響SS-RIF,但是這種影響會(huì)受到說者專家性的影響。(2)聽者的卷入水平會(huì)影響SS-RIF,與處于低卷入水平時(shí)相比,被試處于高卷入水平時(shí),與說者同時(shí)提取的范圍可能會(huì)“超越”說者提取的內(nèi)容,進(jìn)而消除SS-RIF。
[Abstract]:Cucus Koppel and Hirstfen 2007) found that the selective extraction of the speaker not only led to the extraction induced forgetfulness effect, but also resulted in similar extraction-induced forgetting effect in the listener. This kind of extraction induced amnesia in the listener is called social coextraction induced amnesia SS-RIFA socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting. The key to the emergence of SS-RIF lies in the covert extraction of both the listener and the speaker. There are many factors affecting SS-RIF, but there are some factors, such as the way of listener monitoring, the social relationship between the speaker and the listener affects the degree of simultaneous extraction by the listener. In this study, three experiments were conducted to explore the effects of the speaker's expertise and the different levels of listener involvement on SSRIF. Experiment 1 used 2 (expert speaker: expert vs. Non-expert) * 2 (controversial topic: controversial topic vs. The three-factor mixed experimental design of 脳 3 (extraction type: Rp + Rp- and Nrp), in which the extracted type is the inter-subject variable, the expert nature of the speaker and the controversial topic is the inter-subject variable, and the dependent variable is the recall rate of each type of item. Experiment 2 uses controversial topics as the experimental material, using 2 (expert speaker: expert vs. Non-expert) * 2 (the attitude of the listener and the speaker is consistent: consistent vs. The three factors mixed experiment design of extracting type: RP + Rp- and Nrp) showed that the consistency of the attitude of the listener and the speaker was the variable between the subjects, and the dependent variable was the recall rate of each type of item. The design of experiment 3 was the same as that of experiment 2. The difference was that the participants were involved in the task of situational imagination before the selective exercise stage began. This study concluded that: 1) the consistency between the attitude of the speaker and the speaker will affect SS-RIFs, but this effect will be influenced by the expert influence of the speaker.) the involvement level of the listener will affect the SS-RIFs, compared with the low involvement level. When the participants were at a high level of involvement, the range of simultaneous extraction with the lobbyist might "go beyond" the content extracted by the lobbyist, thereby eliminating SS-RIFs.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 白鷺;毛偉賓;李治亞;;社會(huì)性記憶的新領(lǐng)域:社會(huì)性共同提取誘發(fā)遺忘[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2016年05期

2 楊紅升,朱瀅;自我與提取誘發(fā)遺忘現(xiàn)象[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉旭;提取誘發(fā)遺忘的發(fā)展及其機(jī)制研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1920847