藝術(shù)自律的困境
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-30 23:34
【摘要】： 根據(jù)馬克斯·韋伯的理論,自律作為人類社會現(xiàn)代化以來的一個重要概念,包含有三方面的規(guī)定性：獨立性、平等性、自足性。而藝術(shù)自律就是說,藝術(shù)與其他意識形態(tài)如政治、宗教、哲學(xué)等,彼此之間是相互分離的,它不從屬于自身之外的任何一種意識形態(tài),并且具有自己獨特的評價標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和發(fā)展規(guī)律。但是自律這一概念本身就是一個矛盾的綜合體,這就決定了藝術(shù)自律只能作為一種烏托邦的理想而存在。在具體的藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作和評論中充滿著自律和他律之間的斗爭。從另一個角度來說,藝術(shù)自律處在走不出的困境中。這種困境表現(xiàn)在：一、創(chuàng)造性的壓制和泛化；二、審美性與文學(xué)性及其蔓延。這樣產(chǎn)生的后果是創(chuàng)造性和審美性都不能成為藝術(shù)所獨有的特征,而成為日常生活中各種行為的共性。這種困境正是藝術(shù)自身發(fā)展的內(nèi)在動力所在。自律與他律的矛盾構(gòu)成一種張力,使人類藝術(shù)呈現(xiàn)出多姿多彩的面貌,并在雙方關(guān)系的一次次失衡中找到突破點,為藝術(shù)史的發(fā)展開辟新的道路。如果沒有了這些自律的困境,藝術(shù)能否存在或許也將是個問題。本文試圖從藝術(shù)史、美學(xué)史的角度,展示從古至今藝術(shù)在自律的過程中所面臨的困境,在此基礎(chǔ)上探討困境產(chǎn)生的深層原因以及藝術(shù)自律的困境對于藝術(shù)本身發(fā)展的意義。
[Abstract]:According to Max Weber's theory, self-discipline, as an important concept since the modernization of human society, contains three aspects of regulation: independence, equality and self-sufficiency. Art self-discipline means that art and other ideologies such as politics, religion, philosophy, etc., are separated from each other, and it is not from any kind of ideology that belongs to itself. And has its own unique evaluation criteria and development laws. However, the concept of self-discipline itself is a contradictory synthesis, which determines that art self-discipline can only exist as a utopian ideal. There is a struggle between self-discipline and heteronomy in concrete artistic creation and criticism. On the other hand, art self-discipline is in a difficult position. The dilemma is as follows: (1) suppression and generalization of creativity; (2) aestheticism and literariness and its spread. The result is that creativity and aesthetics can not become unique characteristics of art, but become the commonality of all kinds of behaviors in daily life. This dilemma is precisely the intrinsic motive force of art's own development. The contradiction between self-discipline and heteronomy constitutes a tension, which makes human art take on a colorful appearance, and finds a breakthrough point in the imbalance between the two sides, thus opening up a new road for the development of art history. Without these self-discipline dilemmas, the existence of art may also be a question. From the angle of the history of art and the history of aesthetics, this paper attempts to show the dilemma of art in the process of self-discipline from ancient times to the present, and on this basis, discusses the deep-seated causes of the dilemma and the significance of the dilemma of art self-discipline to the development of art itself.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：J04
本文編號：2450610
[Abstract]:According to Max Weber's theory, self-discipline, as an important concept since the modernization of human society, contains three aspects of regulation: independence, equality and self-sufficiency. Art self-discipline means that art and other ideologies such as politics, religion, philosophy, etc., are separated from each other, and it is not from any kind of ideology that belongs to itself. And has its own unique evaluation criteria and development laws. However, the concept of self-discipline itself is a contradictory synthesis, which determines that art self-discipline can only exist as a utopian ideal. There is a struggle between self-discipline and heteronomy in concrete artistic creation and criticism. On the other hand, art self-discipline is in a difficult position. The dilemma is as follows: (1) suppression and generalization of creativity; (2) aestheticism and literariness and its spread. The result is that creativity and aesthetics can not become unique characteristics of art, but become the commonality of all kinds of behaviors in daily life. This dilemma is precisely the intrinsic motive force of art's own development. The contradiction between self-discipline and heteronomy constitutes a tension, which makes human art take on a colorful appearance, and finds a breakthrough point in the imbalance between the two sides, thus opening up a new road for the development of art history. Without these self-discipline dilemmas, the existence of art may also be a question. From the angle of the history of art and the history of aesthetics, this paper attempts to show the dilemma of art in the process of self-discipline from ancient times to the present, and on this basis, discusses the deep-seated causes of the dilemma and the significance of the dilemma of art self-discipline to the development of art itself.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：J04
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
中國碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條
1 鄭懷遠(yuǎn);現(xiàn)代性視域下藝術(shù)自律問題研究[D];吉首大學(xué);2012年
，本文編號：2450610
本文鏈接：http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2450610.html
教材專著
