20世紀90年代以來的文學本質(zhì)觀及其評析
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-01 08:16
【摘要】： 文學本質(zhì)一直以來都是人們熱衷于討論的問題,關(guān)于這個問題仁者見仁、智者見智。不同時代對于本質(zhì)問題有不同的闡釋,形成了各種各樣的文學本質(zhì)觀。從較早的模仿說、表現(xiàn)說,到后來的接受論、審美論等等,人們對文學本質(zhì)的認識經(jīng)歷了一個歷史的發(fā)展過程。對文學本質(zhì)追問的過程也是需要我們不斷思考和反思的。人們在追問本質(zhì)“為何”與“如何”的過程中,對文學和生活也就有了更深入的思考。 文學始終都與時代和社會的發(fā)展密切相關(guān)。20世紀90年代以來,關(guān)于文學本質(zhì)問題的討論發(fā)生了很大的變化。這其中融入了時代語境的變化,文學形態(tài)的變遷和理論言說者興趣關(guān)切的變更。討論20世紀90年代以來的文學本質(zhì)觀,包含著對文學置身的時代語境的體察,文學理論言說方式特點的考量,以及本質(zhì)作為一個問題的厘定。 論文共分為四章。第一章描述20世紀90年代以來文學本質(zhì)言說的新境遇。由于社會環(huán)境、文學觀念和知識模式的變化,文學的境遇有了很大的不同。20世紀80年代文學如此繁盛,它在社會中發(fā)揮著主導(dǎo)作用,是特殊時期精英文化的第一載體。但是90年代以后,文學呈現(xiàn)大眾化的趨勢,電子媒介的出現(xiàn)促成了新文學樣式的誕生,由此引發(fā)了人們對文學認識上的變化。第二章是對90年代以來的幾種有代表性的文學本質(zhì)觀的分析。雖然受后現(xiàn)代主義和文化研究的雙重沖擊,文學理論界有的學者開始回避本質(zhì)問題,但是關(guān)于文學本質(zhì)的討論并沒有終結(jié),還涌現(xiàn)出了幾種有代表性的觀點。最引人矚目的就是圍繞“文學審美意識形態(tài)論”而引發(fā)的一場論爭。還有從系統(tǒng)或綜合的角度或文學本體論的高度來探討本質(zhì)問題的。第三章考察了反本質(zhì)主義的文學“本質(zhì)”觀。反本質(zhì)主義反對對文學的本質(zhì)主義概括,但是在對文學的分析過程中實際上已經(jīng)包含了對文學本質(zhì)的考察,仍然是一種關(guān)于文學的本質(zhì)觀。第四章對文學性的概念及發(fā)展作了簡單的梳理,尤其對后現(xiàn)代“文學性”進行探討。后現(xiàn)代“文學性”概念為文學的泛化趨勢提供了新的闡釋空間,引發(fā)了人們思考文學在社會文化結(jié)構(gòu)中所處地位及應(yīng)有的意義。通過對“文學性”的分析和探討,同樣可以獲得對文學的認識和觀照。但是,對“文學性”的探討,并不能取代對文學本質(zhì)的追問。文學本質(zhì)問題不會終結(jié),反而具有常說常新的特點。
[Abstract]:The essence of literature has always been a hot topic for discussion. Different times have different interpretations of the nature of literature, forming a variety of views on the nature of literature. From the earlier theory of imitation, the theory of expression, to the later acceptance theory, aesthetic theory and so on, people's understanding of the essence of literature experienced a historical development process. The process of questioning the essence of literature also needs us to ponder and reflect on. In the process of questioning the essence of "why" and "how", people also have more in-depth thinking about literature and life. Literature has always been closely related to the development of the times and society. Since the 1990s, great changes have taken place in the discussion of the nature of literature. It incorporates the changes of the context of the times, the change of the literary form and the change of the interest of the theorists. This paper discusses the view of literary essence since the 1990s, including the understanding of the context of the times in which literature is placed, the consideration of the characteristics of literary theory, and the determination of the essence as a problem. The thesis is divided into four chapters. The first chapter describes the new situation of literary essence since 1990s. Due to the change of social environment, literary concept and knowledge mode, the situation of literature is very different. In the 1980s, literature flourished so well that it played a leading role in society and was the first carrier of elite culture in special period. However, after the 1990s, literature showed the trend of popularization. The emergence of electronic media contributed to the birth of the new literary style, which led to changes in people's understanding of literature. The second chapter is the analysis of several representative literary essentials since 1990's. Despite the double impact of post-modernism and cultural studies, some scholars in literary theory began to evade the issue of essence, but the discussion on the nature of literature has not ended, and several representative views have emerged. The most remarkable is the controversy caused by the theory of literary aesthetic ideology. Also from the perspective of system or synthesis or literary ontology to explore the nature of the problem. The third chapter examines the anti-essentialism view of literary "essence". Anti-essentialism opposes the generalization of the essentialism of literature, but in the process of analyzing literature, it has actually included an examination of the essence of literature, which is still a view of the essence of literature. The fourth chapter makes a simple review of the concept and development of literariness, especially the post-modern "literariness". The concept of "literariness" in post-modern times provides a new interpretation space for the trend of generalization of literature, and causes people to think about the position and significance of literature in the social and cultural structure. Through the analysis and discussion of "literariness", we can also obtain the understanding and reflection of literature. However, the exploration of "literariness" can not replace the inquiry of the essence of literature. The essence of literature will not end, but it has the characteristics of saying often and new.
【學位授予單位】：河北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：I01
本文編號：2451399
[Abstract]:The essence of literature has always been a hot topic for discussion. Different times have different interpretations of the nature of literature, forming a variety of views on the nature of literature. From the earlier theory of imitation, the theory of expression, to the later acceptance theory, aesthetic theory and so on, people's understanding of the essence of literature experienced a historical development process. The process of questioning the essence of literature also needs us to ponder and reflect on. In the process of questioning the essence of "why" and "how", people also have more in-depth thinking about literature and life. Literature has always been closely related to the development of the times and society. Since the 1990s, great changes have taken place in the discussion of the nature of literature. It incorporates the changes of the context of the times, the change of the literary form and the change of the interest of the theorists. This paper discusses the view of literary essence since the 1990s, including the understanding of the context of the times in which literature is placed, the consideration of the characteristics of literary theory, and the determination of the essence as a problem. The thesis is divided into four chapters. The first chapter describes the new situation of literary essence since 1990s. Due to the change of social environment, literary concept and knowledge mode, the situation of literature is very different. In the 1980s, literature flourished so well that it played a leading role in society and was the first carrier of elite culture in special period. However, after the 1990s, literature showed the trend of popularization. The emergence of electronic media contributed to the birth of the new literary style, which led to changes in people's understanding of literature. The second chapter is the analysis of several representative literary essentials since 1990's. Despite the double impact of post-modernism and cultural studies, some scholars in literary theory began to evade the issue of essence, but the discussion on the nature of literature has not ended, and several representative views have emerged. The most remarkable is the controversy caused by the theory of literary aesthetic ideology. Also from the perspective of system or synthesis or literary ontology to explore the nature of the problem. The third chapter examines the anti-essentialism view of literary "essence". Anti-essentialism opposes the generalization of the essentialism of literature, but in the process of analyzing literature, it has actually included an examination of the essence of literature, which is still a view of the essence of literature. The fourth chapter makes a simple review of the concept and development of literariness, especially the post-modern "literariness". The concept of "literariness" in post-modern times provides a new interpretation space for the trend of generalization of literature, and causes people to think about the position and significance of literature in the social and cultural structure. Through the analysis and discussion of "literariness", we can also obtain the understanding and reflection of literature. However, the exploration of "literariness" can not replace the inquiry of the essence of literature. The essence of literature will not end, but it has the characteristics of saying often and new.
【學位授予單位】：河北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：I01
【引證文獻】
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 謝微;反本質(zhì)主義語境下的文學本質(zhì)問題[D];江西師范大學;2012年
，本文編號：2451399
本文鏈接：http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2451399.html
教材專著
