法庭會話中的打斷現(xiàn)象研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2020-12-07 09:11
庭審是當(dāng)事人為了實(shí)現(xiàn)自己的利益而進(jìn)行質(zhì)辯的對抗性言語活動。根據(jù)有關(guān)法律的規(guī)定，法庭庭審分為宣布開庭、法庭調(diào)查、法庭辯論、最后陳述和判決五個(gè)階段。其中法庭調(diào)查和法庭辯論是庭審不可或缺的階段，更是實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正，維護(hù)當(dāng)事人權(quán)益的核心手段。勿庸置疑，法庭話語研究的中心也集中于對法庭調(diào)查和法庭辯論階段庭審技巧及語言特點(diǎn)的研究。 本文以真實(shí)的庭審話語為語料，以會話分析作為理論基礎(chǔ)，對庭審中出現(xiàn)頻率很高的打斷現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行研究。首先，基于對Sacks,Schegloff和Jefferson提出的話輪轉(zhuǎn)換模式（turn-taking model）及機(jī)構(gòu)話語的回顧和分析，作者將法官在庭審中的作用主要?dú)w納為三方面：（1）分配話輪（Turn allocation），（2）控制話輪長度（Control the turn size），（3）話輪仲裁（Turn mediation）。第二，為了更好的研究法官語言，本文以打斷現(xiàn)象為切入點(diǎn)，總結(jié)Ferguoson、Murray及Watts等人提出的不同特點(diǎn) 將打斷為butting in interruption,overlap,silent interruption,...
【文章來源】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)廣東省
【文章頁數(shù)】：73 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
DECLARATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
中文摘要
LIST OF FIGURES
TRANSCRIPTION CONVENTIONS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: TURN-TAKING, OVERLAPPING AND INTERRUPTION
1.3 RATIONALE OF THE STUDY
1.4 DATAAND METHODOLOGY
1.4.1 The analyzing tool—conversation analysis （CA）
1.4.2 Research questions of this thesis
1.5 OUTLINE OF THE WHOLE PAPER
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT LITERATURE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 STUDIES ON CONVERSATION ANALYSIS （CA）
2.2.1 Introduction and historical background
2.2.2 A concise introduction of the turn-taking model
2.3 STUDIES ON INTERRUPTION AND SIMULTANEOUS SPEECH
2.3.1 Differing interruption from overlap
2.3.2 Interruption as face-threatening act （FTA） and the exercise of power
2.3.3 Studies on interruption in courtroom interaction
2.4 STUDIES ON INSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE
2.4.1 Using CA study institutional discourse
2.4.2 Institutional Studies on Courtroom Interaction
2.4.3 Studies on asymmetry and power
2.5 BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF CHINESE CIVIL PROCEDURES
2.6 MODIFICATION OF TURN-TAKING STRUCTURE IN COURTROOM
CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF TURN
3.3 THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE PRESENT STUDY
3.3.1 The causes of interruption/overlapping
3.3.2 Description of the theoretical framework
3.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS OF COURTROOM INTERRUPTIONS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 TRIAL TALK: THE ROLE OF JUDGE IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
4.2.1 Judge talk: keeping order in court
4.2.2 Judicial monologue: court instructions and rulings
4.2.3 Judicial Dialogue: objections and asking for clarification
4.3 METHODS TO INTERRUPTION IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
4.3.1 Butting in interruption
4.3.2 Silent interruption: intervening without overlap
4.3.3 Simple interruption
4.3.4 Overlap
4.4 POWER AND LANGUAGE IN THE COURTROOM
4.4.1 Power relations in the courtroom
4.4.2 Rule-oriented versus relation-oriented accounts
4.5 CAUSES AND PLACES OF INTERRUPTION IN THE COURTROOM
4.5.1 Dissynchronization
4.5.2 Role-conflict
4.5.3 Procedural Limit
4.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 5 ATTEMPTED EXPLANATIONS
5.1 SUMMERY OF THE PRESENT STUDY
5.2 MAJOR FINDINGS
5.3 IMPLICATIONS
5.4 LIMITATIONS
5.5 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]口語交談中的話語打斷現(xiàn)象[J]. 匡小榮. 修辭學(xué)習(xí). 2005(04)
[2]民事庭審程序中的若干問題研究[J]. 相慶梅. 現(xiàn)代法學(xué). 2005(02)
[3]自然會話中的打斷現(xiàn)象分析[J]. 李悅娥,申智奇. 當(dāng)代語言學(xué). 2003(01)
碩士論文
[1]如何在法庭問話中通過話題控制獲取所需信息——語篇分析研究[D]. 葛云鋒.廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué) 2004
[2]法庭交叉詢問的鄰近應(yīng)對分析[D]. 韓征瑞.廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué) 2004
本文編號：2903003
【文章來源】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)廣東省
【文章頁數(shù)】：73 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
DECLARATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
中文摘要
LIST OF FIGURES
TRANSCRIPTION CONVENTIONS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: TURN-TAKING, OVERLAPPING AND INTERRUPTION
1.3 RATIONALE OF THE STUDY
1.4 DATAAND METHODOLOGY
1.4.1 The analyzing tool—conversation analysis （CA）
1.4.2 Research questions of this thesis
1.5 OUTLINE OF THE WHOLE PAPER
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT LITERATURE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 STUDIES ON CONVERSATION ANALYSIS （CA）
2.2.1 Introduction and historical background
2.2.2 A concise introduction of the turn-taking model
2.3 STUDIES ON INTERRUPTION AND SIMULTANEOUS SPEECH
2.3.1 Differing interruption from overlap
2.3.2 Interruption as face-threatening act （FTA） and the exercise of power
2.3.3 Studies on interruption in courtroom interaction
2.4 STUDIES ON INSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE
2.4.1 Using CA study institutional discourse
2.4.2 Institutional Studies on Courtroom Interaction
2.4.3 Studies on asymmetry and power
2.5 BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF CHINESE CIVIL PROCEDURES
2.6 MODIFICATION OF TURN-TAKING STRUCTURE IN COURTROOM
CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF TURN
3.3 THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE PRESENT STUDY
3.3.1 The causes of interruption/overlapping
3.3.2 Description of the theoretical framework
3.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS OF COURTROOM INTERRUPTIONS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 TRIAL TALK: THE ROLE OF JUDGE IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
4.2.1 Judge talk: keeping order in court
4.2.2 Judicial monologue: court instructions and rulings
4.2.3 Judicial Dialogue: objections and asking for clarification
4.3 METHODS TO INTERRUPTION IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
4.3.1 Butting in interruption
4.3.2 Silent interruption: intervening without overlap
4.3.3 Simple interruption
4.3.4 Overlap
4.4 POWER AND LANGUAGE IN THE COURTROOM
4.4.1 Power relations in the courtroom
4.4.2 Rule-oriented versus relation-oriented accounts
4.5 CAUSES AND PLACES OF INTERRUPTION IN THE COURTROOM
4.5.1 Dissynchronization
4.5.2 Role-conflict
4.5.3 Procedural Limit
4.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 5 ATTEMPTED EXPLANATIONS
5.1 SUMMERY OF THE PRESENT STUDY
5.2 MAJOR FINDINGS
5.3 IMPLICATIONS
5.4 LIMITATIONS
5.5 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]口語交談中的話語打斷現(xiàn)象[J]. 匡小榮. 修辭學(xué)習(xí). 2005(04)
[2]民事庭審程序中的若干問題研究[J]. 相慶梅. 現(xiàn)代法學(xué). 2005(02)
[3]自然會話中的打斷現(xiàn)象分析[J]. 李悅娥,申智奇. 當(dāng)代語言學(xué). 2003(01)
碩士論文
[1]如何在法庭問話中通過話題控制獲取所需信息——語篇分析研究[D]. 葛云鋒.廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué) 2004
[2]法庭交叉詢問的鄰近應(yīng)對分析[D]. 韓征瑞.廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué) 2004
本文編號：2903003
本文鏈接：http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/falvlunwen/fashilw/2903003.html
最近更新
教材專著
