發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-05 17:12

【摘要】：近年來(lái)不斷涌現(xiàn)的高校管理與懲戒訴訟案件,高校管理法治化成為了熱議的話題。根據(jù)《中華人民共和國(guó)教育法》第二十八條和《中華人民共和國(guó)高等教育法》第四十一條,高等學(xué)�？梢詫�(duì)學(xué)生進(jìn)行管理和處分,這就說(shuō)明高校有懲戒權(quán)。受教育權(quán)是憲法賦予公民的一項(xiàng)基本權(quán)利,是公認(rèn)的一項(xiàng)基本人權(quán)。 高校的懲戒權(quán)如行使不當(dāng)就會(huì)侵犯公民的這一基本憲法權(quán)利。我國(guó)法律中沒(méi)有規(guī)定高校學(xué)校享有自治權(quán),但在《高等教育法》里規(guī)定了高等學(xué)校有自主管理權(quán)。教育部將退學(xué)的條件標(biāo)準(zhǔn)交給高等學(xué)校設(shè)立違反了法律保留原則。對(duì)于限制、剝奪學(xué)生受教育權(quán)的內(nèi)容不應(yīng)由行政機(jī)關(guān)代為規(guī)定,教育部的規(guī)章設(shè)立剝奪學(xué)生主體資格的內(nèi)容,其立法層次偏低。對(duì)于學(xué)生除了開除學(xué)籍之外非身份性懲戒,高�？梢宰孕幸�(guī)定,但開除學(xué)籍等身份性懲戒因其可能侵害到學(xué)生的基本憲法權(quán)利一受教育權(quán),應(yīng)由法律予以規(guī)定。應(yīng)完善高校懲戒權(quán)的相關(guān)程序,以保證實(shí)施中的程序公正。并給予學(xué)生申訴的權(quán)力,明確申訴和復(fù)議的分工,將高校懲戒權(quán)納入訴訟的范圍內(nèi)。但是對(duì)于高校懲戒行為的司法審查應(yīng)是有限的。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the management and disciplinary litigation cases in colleges and universities have emerged, and the legalization of university management has become a hot topic. According to Article 28 of the Education Law of the people's Republic of China and Article 41 of the higher Education Law of the people's Republic of China, institutions of higher learning can administer and punish students, which means that colleges and universities have the right to discipline. The right to education is a basic right granted by the Constitution and recognized as a basic human right. Improper exercise of disciplinary power in colleges and universities will infringe upon this basic constitutional right of citizens. The law of our country does not stipulate that colleges and universities have the right of autonomy, but in the Law of higher Education, they have the right of independent management. The Ministry of Education has violated the principle of legal reservation by handing over the conditions for dropping out to institutions of higher learning. To limit, the content of depriving students of their right to education should not be stipulated by the administrative organs. The regulations of the Ministry of Education establish the contents of depriving students of their subject qualifications, and their legislative level is on the low side. In addition to expelling students from school, colleges and universities can provide for the punishment of non-status, but the expulsion of students and other status punishment may infringe upon the students' basic constitutional right to receive education, which should be stipulated by law. It is necessary to perfect the relevant procedures of disciplinary power in colleges and universities in order to ensure the procedural justice in the course of implementation. It also gives students the right to appeal, clarifies the division of complaint and reconsideration, and brings the disciplinary right of higher education into the scope of litigation. However, the judicial review of disciplinary actions in colleges and universities should be limited.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 季衛(wèi)東;程序比較論[J];比較法研究;1993年01期

2 張靜;論高校對(duì)學(xué)生的管理權(quán)與學(xué)生受教育權(quán)的沖突與平衡[J];河北法學(xué);2003年02期

3 楊金華;;大學(xué)自治權(quán)與受教育自由權(quán)之間的平衡[J];教育評(píng)論;2006年05期

4 楊建生;梁智俊;;受教育權(quán)法律保留原則與大學(xué)自治的沖突及其解決[J];遼寧教育研究;2005年10期

5 程雁雷;論司法審查對(duì)大學(xué)自治的有限介入[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2000年02期

6 溫輝;受教育權(quán)可訴性研究[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2000年03期

7 溫輝;受教育權(quán)的司法保障——一則受教育權(quán)案例所引起的法律思考[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2003年01期

8 陳恩倫;;關(guān)于學(xué)生申訴立法的思考[J];中國(guó)教育學(xué)刊;2005年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2166442