發(fā)布時間：2019-05-12 11:37

【摘要】：我國農(nóng)村土地主要以農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織內(nèi)部家庭承包方式進(jìn)行經(jīng)營管理,發(fā)包方為村集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織或村民委員會,承包方則是本集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的農(nóng)戶。國內(nèi)外學(xué)界對我國土地制度的研究頗豐,國內(nèi)學(xué)界更是提出對土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛解決機制進(jìn)行完善,并提出詳盡的立法建議,但對于農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛具體案件的處理上,缺乏以現(xiàn)有立法為手段的具體解決方案。本文想要研究解決的,是農(nóng)村土地以家庭承包方式進(jìn)行經(jīng)營管理時,農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部成員的糾紛問題,即農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛。本文通過對我國現(xiàn)行立法和學(xué)界觀點的研究,以案為例,列舉農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛的典型表現(xiàn)形式,對糾紛產(chǎn)生原因進(jìn)行分析,從程序和實體上提出解決該類糾紛的對策,并對完善農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)制度提出建議。 本文共分五個部分： 第一部分為“農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛概論”,本章提出了本文想要解決的農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營糾紛問題中所指的農(nóng)戶的概念,對農(nóng)戶及其成員法律地位、農(nóng)戶成員對土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的關(guān)系進(jìn)行分析研究。 第二部分為“農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛典型表現(xiàn)形式”,本章對農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛歸納了三種典型的表現(xiàn)形式,并分別列舉案例加以說明。 第三部分為“農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛成因分析”,本章是對農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛的成因進(jìn)行了分析,認(rèn)為產(chǎn)生糾紛的主要原因是農(nóng)村土地登記制度落實不到位以及村規(guī)民約與農(nóng)戶成員尤其是婦女的權(quán)益矛盾。 第四部分為“解決農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛的對策”,這是本研究的重點和落腳點,本章從我國現(xiàn)有立法的角度,從程序和實體上提出解決農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛的對策。通過協(xié)商調(diào)解、仲裁、行政、訴訟(包括司法確認(rèn)、民事訴訟)的程序,對農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛進(jìn)行處理。同時對三類典型的農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛,在上述四個程序中分別進(jìn)行實體處理方法的研究,并對第二章中列舉的三個案例提出實體上的處理意見。重點分析了農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛是否具有民事可訴性。 第五部分為“完善我國農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)制度的建議”,為減少和解決農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)糾紛,對完善農(nóng)戶內(nèi)部土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)制度提出四點建議。
[Abstract]:The rural land in our country is mainly operated and managed by household contract within the rural collective economic organization, the contractor is the village collective economic organization or the villagers' committee, and the contractor is the peasant household of the collective economic organization. The domestic and foreign academic circles have done a lot of research on the land system of our country, and the domestic academic circles have put forward to perfect the dispute settlement mechanism of the land contractual management right and put forward detailed legislative suggestions. However, there is a lack of specific solutions to the disputes over land contractual management rights within farmers. What this paper wants to solve is the dispute between the internal members of farmers, that is, the dispute of land contractual management right within farmers, when the rural land is operated and managed by household contract. Through the study of the current legislation and academic views of our country, taking the case as an example, this paper enumerates the typical forms of disputes over land contractual management rights within farmers, and analyzes the causes of the disputes. This paper puts forward some countermeasures to solve this kind of disputes from the aspects of procedure and entity, and puts forward some suggestions for perfecting the system of land contractual management rights within farmers. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is an introduction to the disputes of land contractual management rights within farmers. This chapter puts forward the concept of farmers in the disputes of land contractual management within farmers that this paper wants to solve. The legal status of farmers and their members and the relationship between farmers' members and land contractual management rights are analyzed and studied. The second part is "the typical manifestation of the dispute of land contractual management right within farmers". This chapter sums up three typical forms of dispute of internal land contractual management right of farmers, and enumerates the cases to illustrate it respectively. The third part is "Analysis of the causes of disputes over land contractual management rights within farmers". This chapter analyzes the causes of disputes over land contractual management rights within farmers. It is considered that the main reasons for the disputes are the lack of implementation of the rural land registration system and the contradiction between the village rules and regulations and the rights and interests of farmers, especially women. The fourth part is "the countermeasures to solve the disputes of land contractual management rights within farmers", which is the focus and foothold of this study. This chapter is from the perspective of the existing legislation of our country. This paper puts forward some countermeasures to solve the disputes of land contractual management rights within farmers from the aspects of procedures and entities. Through the procedures of negotiation mediation, arbitration, administration and litigation (including judicial confirmation and civil action), the disputes of land contractual management rights within farmers are dealt with. At the same time, for three typical disputes of land contractual management rights within farmers, the entity treatment methods are studied in the above four procedures, and the substantive treatment opinions are put forward for the three cases listed in the second chapter. This paper focuses on the analysis of whether the dispute of land contractual management right within farmers is civil litigable. The fifth part is "suggestions on perfecting the system of land contractual management rights within farmers in our country". In order to reduce and solve the disputes of internal land contractual management rights among farmers, four suggestions are put forward to improve the system of internal land contractual management rights for farmers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓志才;袁敏殊;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)主體辨析[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

2 張靜;;鄉(xiāng)規(guī)民約體現(xiàn)的村莊治權(quán)[J];北大法律評論;1999年01期

3 蔡虹;;農(nóng)村土地糾紛及其解決機制研究[J];法學(xué)評論;2008年02期

4 袁娟;;部分共同共有人擅自處分共有財產(chǎn)的效力[J];法制與社會;2007年02期

5 陳會廣;;農(nóng)戶兼業(yè)化與農(nóng)村土地制度變遷——基于家庭內(nèi)部分工的分析框架及政策含義[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年01期

6 裴樺;;關(guān)于共同共有兩個基本問題的思考——兼評我國《物權(quán)法》相關(guān)條款[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期

7 傅鼎生,李錫鶴,張馳;關(guān)于物權(quán)法幾個問題的探討[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年04期

8 白呈明;“農(nóng)戶”內(nèi)部法律關(guān)系解析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2003年05期

9 付中強;關(guān)于完善《物權(quán)法(草案)》對土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)物權(quán)化改造的幾點建議[J];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年03期

10 劉俊;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)性質(zhì)探討[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年02期

，

本文編號：2475360