發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-24 00:39

  本文選題：無(wú)意識(shí)思維 + 人格特質(zhì)��； 參考：《寧波大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近20年來(lái)，決策心理學(xué)已成為心理學(xué)研究領(lǐng)域的研究熱點(diǎn)之一；而Dijksterhuis等人于2006年提出的無(wú)意識(shí)思維理論(Unconscious Thought Theory, UTT)則是這一熱點(diǎn)研究領(lǐng)域中興起的新的研究課題。該理論指出人類(lèi)有兩種思維模式——意識(shí)思維和無(wú)意識(shí)思維。意識(shí)思維適用于簡(jiǎn)單問(wèn)題的決策，無(wú)意識(shí)思維適用于復(fù)雜問(wèn)題的決策。他們稱(chēng)在復(fù)雜問(wèn)題中無(wú)意識(shí)思維對(duì)問(wèn)題解決的促進(jìn)作用為無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)(unconscious thought effect, UTE)或沉思無(wú)需注意效應(yīng)(deliberation-without-attention effect)。然而，不少研究發(fā)現(xiàn)無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)并不穩(wěn)定。Dijksterhuis等人從研究范式、問(wèn)題復(fù)雜度等方面探討了影響無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)穩(wěn)定的因素，不同于探究無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)的外部穩(wěn)定因素的研究，本研究試圖通過(guò)研究?jī)?nèi)部因素——人格對(duì)無(wú)意識(shí)思維的影響，來(lái)證明人格特質(zhì)對(duì)無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)的重要作用，即并非所有個(gè)體使用無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)解決復(fù)雜問(wèn)題都可以出現(xiàn)無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)。本研究將對(duì)此進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證，并探討哪些人格特質(zhì)影響無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)及其影響機(jī)制。 本研究基于以往無(wú)意識(shí)思維研究范式，考察受暗示性、信任以及A/B型人格等人格特質(zhì)對(duì)無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)影響。通過(guò)兩個(gè)研究得到以下結(jié)論： 第一，受暗示性對(duì)無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)有顯著影響，，高受暗示性組在室友選擇任務(wù)中的態(tài)度差異得分邊緣顯著優(yōu)于低受暗示性組；信任對(duì)無(wú)意識(shí)思維有顯著影響，高信任組在室友選擇任務(wù)中的態(tài)度差異得分顯著優(yōu)于低信任組。 第二，A/B型人格對(duì)無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)有顯著影響，A型人格個(gè)體在室友選擇任務(wù)中的態(tài)度差異得分顯著優(yōu)于B型人格個(gè)體。 本研究在理論層面上進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)展和深化了對(duì)無(wú)意識(shí)思維的理解，統(tǒng)合了當(dāng)前無(wú)意識(shí)思維研究的結(jié)果。在無(wú)意識(shí)思維理論的內(nèi)穩(wěn)因素中引入人格特質(zhì)這一變量，從人格角度解釋了當(dāng)前研究結(jié)果的不一致。在現(xiàn)實(shí)層面上，本研究為人們?nèi)绾胃�好地使用無(wú)意識(shí)思維來(lái)解決復(fù)雜問(wèn)題提供了指導(dǎo)和借鑒。
[Abstract]:In the last 20 years, decision psychology has become one of the hotspots in the field of psychology research, and the Unconscious Thought Theory (UTT), which was put forward by Dijksterhuis and others in 2006, is a new research topic in this hot research field. This theory points out that there are two modes of thinking in human beings - conscious thinking and Unconscious thinking. Conscious thinking applies to the decision of simple problems. Unconscious thinking applies to complex problems. They call the unconscious thinking in complex problems the unconscious thought effect (UTE) or the deliberation-without-attention effect (deliberation-without-attention effect). However, many studies have found that the effect of unconscious thinking is not stable..Dijksterhuis and others have discussed the factors that affect the stability of the unconscious thinking effect from the research paradigm and the complexity of the problem. It is different from the study of the external stability factors that explore the unconscious thinking effect. This research attempts to study the internal factors, personality to unintentional factors. The influence of intellectual thinking proves the important role of personality traits to the unconscious thinking effect, that is, not all individuals can have unconscious thinking effects with the use of unconscious thinking effects. This study will verify this and explore which personality traits affect the unconscious thinking effect and its influence mechanism.
Based on the previous research paradigm of unconscious thinking, this study examines the effects of personality traits, such as suggestive, trust and A/B personality, on the unconscious thinking effect. The following conclusions are obtained through two studies:
First, it has a significant influence on the unconscious thinking effect. The margin of the attitude difference in the roommate selection task is significantly better than that of the low implied group, and the trust has a significant influence on the unconscious thinking, and the attitude difference score of the high trust group in the roommate selection task is significantly better than that of the low trust group.
Second, type A/B personality has a significant effect on unconscious thinking effect, and A personality individuals scored significantly better than B personality individuals in roommate's choice task.
This study further expands and deepens the understanding of unconscious thinking and integrates the result of the present unconscious thinking. The variable of personality trait is introduced into the internal stability factor of the unconscious thinking theory, and the inconsistency of the current research results is explained from the personality angle. Better use of unconscious thinking to solve complex problems has provided guidance and reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B848

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 徐君;佟月華;;大學(xué)生完美主義與A型人格的關(guān)系[J];濟(jì)南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2008年04期

2 梁竹苑;許燕;蔣獎(jiǎng);;決策中個(gè)體差異研究現(xiàn)狀述評(píng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2007年04期

3 孫彥;李紓;殷曉莉;;決策與推理的雙系統(tǒng)——啟發(fā)式系統(tǒng)和分析系統(tǒng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2007年05期

4 龐捷敏;原獻(xiàn)學(xué);李建升;;無(wú)意識(shí)研究新進(jìn)展:無(wú)意識(shí)思維理論述評(píng)[J];心理學(xué)探新;2007年04期

5 狄敏,黃希庭,張永紅;大學(xué)生時(shí)間管理傾向和A型人格的關(guān)系研究[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2004年02期

6 唐安平，賈新生，倪紅，陳曉，吳素萍，張春夢(mèng)，夏葉玲，陳建新;暗示性的測(cè)量及其對(duì)學(xué)習(xí)成績(jī)的影響[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;1995年01期

7 劉磊鑫;蔡璇;原獻(xiàn)學(xué);;知識(shí)遷移對(duì)無(wú)意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)的作用[J];心理科學(xué);2012年05期

本文編號(hào)：2059175