有關(guān)當(dāng)代人文科學(xué)研究主體心態(tài)素質(zhì)提升問(wèn)題的思考——以趙憲章、鄧曉芒和鮑鵬山教授及其相關(guān)論著為分析例據(jù)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-17 09:50
【摘要】：本文劃分當(dāng)下中國(guó)人文科學(xué)研究為項(xiàng)目學(xué)術(shù)、學(xué)院學(xué)術(shù)和江湖學(xué)術(shù)三種類型,并分別選取趙憲章教授等合著《藝術(shù)與語(yǔ)言的關(guān)系研究》、鄧曉芒教授《文學(xué)沖突的四大主題》和鮑鵬山教授《孔子如來(lái)》作為代表。文章側(cè)重從研究者主體心態(tài)素質(zhì)提升的角度討論中國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)研究生態(tài)環(huán)境改善的可能性,以此回應(yīng)有關(guān)"當(dāng)下中國(guó)如何造就學(xué)術(shù)大師"問(wèn)題的討論。對(duì)應(yīng)研究工作的三種類型,就研究者的意識(shí)自覺(jué)言之,應(yīng)注意克服三種可能的消極心態(tài)對(duì)研究過(guò)程所可能造成的干擾,即執(zhí)掌話語(yǔ)權(quán)意識(shí)所可能滋生的虛妄、學(xué)術(shù)成就所可能導(dǎo)致的自戀和江湖聲譽(yù)所可能誘發(fā)的任性。所謂心態(tài)素質(zhì)的核心,即反省并自覺(jué)克服諸如此類消極心態(tài)對(duì)研究過(guò)程的干擾的能力。
[Abstract]:This paper divides the current Chinese humanities research into three types: project academic, college academic and Jianghu academic, and selects Professor Zhao and other co-authors of the study of the relationship between Art and language, respectively. Professor Deng Xiaomang and Professor Bao Pengshan represented the four themes of literary conflict. This paper focuses on discussing the possibility of improving the ecological environment of Chinese academic research from the perspective of the improvement of the subjective mental quality of the researchers, so as to respond to the discussion about "how to build up academic masters in China at present". Corresponding to the three types of research work, in terms of the consciousness of the researcher, we should pay attention to overcoming the interference that the three possible negative mentality may cause to the research process, that is, the hypocrisy that the consciousness of holding on to the discourse right may breed. Academic achievements may lead to narcissism and self-determination that may be induced by reputation. The core of the so-called psychological quality is the ability to reflect and consciously overcome the interference of such negative psychology on the research process.
【作者單位】： 北京語(yǔ)言大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：I0
本文編號(hào)：2442173
[Abstract]:This paper divides the current Chinese humanities research into three types: project academic, college academic and Jianghu academic, and selects Professor Zhao and other co-authors of the study of the relationship between Art and language, respectively. Professor Deng Xiaomang and Professor Bao Pengshan represented the four themes of literary conflict. This paper focuses on discussing the possibility of improving the ecological environment of Chinese academic research from the perspective of the improvement of the subjective mental quality of the researchers, so as to respond to the discussion about "how to build up academic masters in China at present". Corresponding to the three types of research work, in terms of the consciousness of the researcher, we should pay attention to overcoming the interference that the three possible negative mentality may cause to the research process, that is, the hypocrisy that the consciousness of holding on to the discourse right may breed. Academic achievements may lead to narcissism and self-determination that may be induced by reputation. The core of the so-called psychological quality is the ability to reflect and consciously overcome the interference of such negative psychology on the research process.
【作者單位】： 北京語(yǔ)言大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：I0
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 鄧曉芒;;文學(xué)沖突的四大主題[J];中國(guó)文學(xué)批評(píng);2015年02期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 韓德民;;有關(guān)當(dāng)代人文科學(xué)研究主體心態(tài)素質(zhì)提升問(wèn)題的思考——以趙憲章、鄧曉芒和鮑鵬山教授及其相關(guān)論著為分析例據(jù)[J];中國(guó)文化研究;2017年03期
2 趙娜;;還原與復(fù)活:抗戰(zhàn)小說(shuō)真實(shí)形態(tài)的超越——論熊育群《己卯年雨雪》的文學(xué)史意義[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2017年07期
3 鄧曉芒;;論文學(xué)批評(píng)的力量[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年06期
4 鄧曉芒;;作為“大科學(xué)”的人文科學(xué)——一種“正位論”的思考[J];哲學(xué)分析;2016年02期
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 朱德發(fā);讀《文學(xué)的調(diào)整與再生》[J];聊城師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年06期
，本文編號(hào)：2442173
本文鏈接：http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2442173.html
最近更新
教材專著
