發(fā)布時間：2018-05-15 09:35

  本文選題：人教版 + 加州版��； 參考：《廣州大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：分數(shù)的知識在日常生活中、科研領域中應用廣泛。為了讓學生更好地理解和掌握分數(shù)知識,許多研究者通過比較分析某個年級或某個具體知識點的例習題編排方式及其知識結(jié)構(gòu)等內(nèi)容的異同,設計精妙的教學設計,來幫助學生理解分數(shù)的本質(zhì),促進學生對分數(shù)知識的掌握。鑒于目前對教科書本身“分數(shù)”知識點的編寫方式是否能較好地幫助學生理解分數(shù)本質(zhì)鮮有系統(tǒng)的研究之現(xiàn)狀,本文通過文獻法、比較法和內(nèi)容分析法,比較分析了中美兩國與“分數(shù)”相關課程標準的詳細程度和課標要求的多少;人教版和加州版數(shù)學教科書中與“分數(shù)”相關知識點的分布特點、知識點呈現(xiàn)順序、知識點的多少以及編寫這些內(nèi)容時借助的直觀圖類型、內(nèi)容的編寫方式和完備程度。主要得到以下結(jié)論:第一,與標準(2011年版)相比,課程中心思想比較具體且完備;第二,與加州版中“分數(shù)”知識點的分布相比,人教版更加系統(tǒng);第三,人教版呈現(xiàn)知識點多利用實物、幾何,加州版還利用數(shù)軸、分數(shù)墻;第四,人教版多以填空、提問探究方式呈現(xiàn)知識點,加州版會呈現(xiàn)完整過程;第五,與人教版中內(nèi)容的完備程度相比,加州版比較完善。并對我國課標研制和人教版教材中與“分數(shù)”相關知識點的編寫提供了具體的建議,還根據(jù)建議進行了較小的嘗試。
[Abstract]:Fractional knowledge is widely used in daily life and in the field of scientific research. In order to enable students to better understand and master the score knowledge, many researchers design subtle teaching design by comparing and analyzing the similarities and differences of examples of exercises arrangement and knowledge structure of a grade or a specific knowledge point, etc. To help students understand the nature of scores and promote students to master the score knowledge. In view of the present situation that whether the writing method of "score" knowledge points of the textbook itself can help students understand the essence of score systematically, this paper adopts literature method, comparative method and content analysis method. This paper compares and analyzes the degree of detail and the requirements of the curriculum standards related to "scores" between China and the United States, the distribution characteristics of the knowledge points related to "scores" and the order in which the knowledge points are presented in the mathematics textbooks of the personal Education Edition and the California edition. The number of knowledge points and the types of visual diagrams, the way the content is written, and the degree of completeness. The main conclusions are as follows: first, compared with the standard (2011 edition), the central idea of the curriculum is more specific and complete; second, compared with the distribution of the "score" knowledge points in the California version, the educational version is more systematic; third, The teaching version of people presents knowledge points, geometry, and the California version also uses digital axes and fractional walls; fourth, the education version of people presents the knowledge points by filling in the blanks and asking questions, and the California version will present a complete process; fifth, the California version will present a complete process; fifthly, the California version will present a complete process by filling in the blanks. Compared with the completeness of the content of the edition, the California version is more perfect. It also provides some suggestions for the development of curriculum standard and the compilation of the knowledge points related to "score" in the teaching material of human education edition in our country, and makes a small attempt according to the suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：廣州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G623.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 丁銳;Yan Ping Xin;;中美小學數(shù)學教材的比較研究——以三年級“分數(shù)的認識”為例[J];數(shù)學教育學報;2016年03期

2 周滿霞;;關注學生心理 凸現(xiàn)知識本質(zhì)——“分數(shù)的大小”教學片段及反思[J];小學教學(數(shù)學版);2015年12期

3 嚴今石;;小學數(shù)學教科書中對小數(shù)與分數(shù)概念教學的思考[J];教育教學論壇;2015年31期

4 徐斌;;形象支撐 溝通聯(lián)系 理解本質(zhì)——六年級上冊“分數(shù)除法”教材解析與教學建議[J];小學數(shù)學教育;2015年Z4期

5 田國偉;余慧;趙雅麗;;中美小學數(shù)學教材“分數(shù)初步認識”的比較研究[J];中小學數(shù)學(小學版);2015年04期

6 蒲淑萍;;“中國 美國 新加坡”小學數(shù)學教材中的“分數(shù)定義”[J];數(shù)學教育學報;2013年04期

7 康sユ，

本文編號：1891913