發(fā)布時(shí)間：2024-07-06 11:38

　　由于學(xué)術(shù)論文摘要的重要性,學(xué)者們把其作為一種獨(dú)立體裁從各個(gè)視角進(jìn)行了研究�！霸�話語(yǔ)”是一個(gè)新興概念,是用于組織語(yǔ)篇、表達(dá)作者對(duì)命題的觀點(diǎn)、考慮讀者感受的一種語(yǔ)言使用手法。正是因?yàn)樵�話語(yǔ)的獨(dú)特意義,越來(lái)越多的學(xué)者關(guān)注學(xué)術(shù)論文中的元話語(yǔ)現(xiàn)象。但是,大部分研究都只把元話語(yǔ)作為一個(gè)文本組織方式來(lái)對(duì)待,很少有研究把元話語(yǔ)作為一種說(shuō)服策略。而說(shuō)服力對(duì)于摘要來(lái)說(shuō)特別重要,關(guān)乎其文章能否發(fā)行,作者的科研成果能否推廣�；�于此,本文致力于摘要中元話語(yǔ)勸說(shuō)功能的研究。筆者以海蘭德的元話語(yǔ)模式(2005,p.49)為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合亞里士多德(1991)提出的三種訴求方式(說(shuō)理,氣質(zhì),動(dòng)情),對(duì)摘要中元話語(yǔ)的說(shuō)服功能作了深入的研究。筆者從5種國(guó)際權(quán)威語(yǔ)言學(xué)期刊上隨機(jī)抽選了75篇于2013-2014年期間發(fā)行的應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文摘要,將其作為研究語(yǔ)料庫(kù)。該研究的主要內(nèi)容:一、分析元話語(yǔ)在摘要中的總體分布情況;二、分析元話語(yǔ)是如何通過(guò)三種訴求方式實(shí)現(xiàn)勸說(shuō)功能的;三、探索分別作用于三種訴求方式的元話語(yǔ)子項(xiàng)在摘要中出現(xiàn)的頻率及其原因。該研究證明:一、元話語(yǔ)以其子項(xiàng)的形式被廣泛運(yùn)用于學(xué)術(shù)論文摘要中。某些元話語(yǔ)子項(xiàng)使用頗為頻繁...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：85 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background
    1.2 Purpose of the study
    1.3 Significance of the study
    1.4 Organization of the study
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Related studies on abstract abroad
    2.2 Related studies on abstract at home
    2.3 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Basis
    3.1 Metadiscourse
        3.1.1 Definition of metadiscourse
        3.1.2 Metadiscourse resources
    3.2 Three appeals of metadiscourse
        3.2.1 Logos appeal
        3.2.2 Ethos appeal
        3.2.3 Pathos appeal
    3.3 Metadiscourse resources and three appeals
        3.3.1 Metadiscourse resources and logos appeal
        3.3.2 Metadiscourse resources and ethos appeal
        3.3.3 Metadiscourse resources and pathos appeal
Chapter Four Research Methodology
    4.1 Research purpose
    4.2 Corpus
    4.3 Method
Chapter Five Results and Findings
    5.1 Overall distribution of metadiscourse in the abstract
    5.2 Persuasion by logos appeal
        5.2.1 Transitions
        5.2.2 Frame markers
        5.2.3 Code glosses
        5.2.4 Evidentials and endophoric markers
    5.3 Persuasion by ethos appeal
        5.3.1 Hedges
        5.3.2 Boosters
        5.3.3 Evidentials
        5.3.4 Self mention
        5.3.5 Engagement markers
    5.4 Persuasion by pathos appeal
        5.4.1 Engagement markers
        5.4.2 Attitude markers
        5.4.3 Self mention
        5.4.4 Hedges
    5.5 Discussion
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Major findings and implications
    6.2 Limitations of the study
Bibliography
Appendix
Acknowledgements



本文編號(hào)：4002495