小學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)學(xué)習(xí)中形成性評(píng)價(jià)的實(shí)踐研究
[Abstract]:The basic education curriculum reform has put forward a new evaluation view. Besides paying attention to the students' learning results, they should pay more attention to the students' mathematical thinking, the evaluation of their problem-solving ability, and the evaluation of the students' learning process. Pay attention to the students' emotional attitude in mathematics activities, advocate the diversification of the evaluation subject and the comprehensive evaluation content. "Green Index Evaluation" implemented in Shanghai breaks through the evaluation mode of single pen and paper test and turns to comprehensive evaluation. Thus, it can be seen that comprehensive, true and in-depth evaluation of students' learning process and learning results, and giving full play to the "development" function of evaluation will be the development trend of educational evaluation. Formative evaluation is different from the traditional result-oriented evaluation model. It attaches importance to the evaluation of students' learning process, emphasizes feedback of students' learning situation, thus promotes students' development, accords with the present evaluation idea, and is worth advocating and practicing. In this paper, the connotation, theoretical basis and characteristics of formative evaluation are expounded by sorting out the literature on formative evaluation, and the main research results and latest development trends of formative evaluation are summarized. To point out the direction of this study. According to the characteristics of formative evaluation and the steps of learning evaluation, the implementation steps of formative evaluation are described in detail. On the basis of theoretical research, the practical research of formative evaluation is carried out through cooperation with primary school mathematics teachers. After determining the evaluation content, carry out the evaluation according to the steps described in this paper. First, the evaluation goal is constructed, then the evaluation method is selected to carry out the evaluation. Finally, the information obtained from the evaluation is analyzed, and the results are fed back to the students and teachers to promote the achievement of the unachieved goal. Through reflection on the practice process, the author sums up the function of formative evaluation, that is, advantage. At the same time, in view of the existing problems in the implementation of formative evaluation, some suggestions are put forward to provide operational guidance and practical basis for further developing formative evaluation of primary school mathematics learning. This paper is divided into five chapters, the first chapter introduces the origin, significance, research content, research methods and research ideas, and summarizes the relevant literature at home and abroad; the second chapter summarizes the formative evaluation. The third chapter is based on the general steps of learning evaluation, combined with the characteristics of formative evaluation, and describes the steps of formative evaluation in detail. The fourth chapter designs three evaluation cases according to the formative evaluation steps and carries out the practice in the practice school. The analysis feedback from the evaluation goal construction to the final evaluation result is shown one by one to provide formative evaluation template for the front-line teachers. The fifth chapter summarizes the advantages of formative evaluation found in practical research and puts forward some suggestions according to the shortcomings found in formative evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:G623.5
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 周慧;綦春霞;;PISA2012數(shù)學(xué)素養(yǎng)測(cè)試分析框架及例題分析[J];教育測(cè)量與評(píng)價(jià)(理論版);2015年05期
2 孫立坤;鮑建生;;提高數(shù)學(xué)教師形成性評(píng)價(jià)能力的設(shè)計(jì)研究[J];數(shù)學(xué)教育學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期
3 趙德成;;教學(xué)中的形成性評(píng)價(jià):是什么及如何推進(jìn)[J];教育科學(xué)研究;2013年03期
4 林靜;;形成性評(píng)價(jià)在高校課程評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];現(xiàn)代教育管理;2011年09期
5 謝娜;;論形成性評(píng)價(jià)在大學(xué)英語(yǔ)教學(xué)中的應(yīng)用[J];國(guó)家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年07期
6 謝金土;;小學(xué)綜合實(shí)踐活動(dòng)課程學(xué)生形成性評(píng)價(jià)基本方式[J];課程教材教學(xué)研究(小教研究);2009年Z2期
7 單黎明;;改革評(píng)價(jià)方式全面發(fā)展學(xué)生的語(yǔ)文能力[J];現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)文(教學(xué)研究版);2006年02期
8 高凌飚;過(guò)程性評(píng)價(jià)的理念和功能[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期
9 袁維新;試論基于建構(gòu)主義的科學(xué)教育理念[J];教育理論與實(shí)踐;2003年24期
10 郭茜,楊志強(qiáng);試論形成性評(píng)價(jià)及其對(duì)大學(xué)英語(yǔ)教學(xué)與測(cè)試的啟示[J];清華大學(xué)教育研究;2003年05期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張生;混合式學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境下基于學(xué)習(xí)活動(dòng)的形成性評(píng)價(jià)的理論與實(shí)踐[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 楊姚;小學(xué)英語(yǔ)形成性評(píng)價(jià)教學(xué)的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2013年
2 夏向男;初中英語(yǔ)課堂教學(xué)形成性評(píng)價(jià)工具的設(shè)計(jì)研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年
3 楊光榮;形成性評(píng)價(jià)在英語(yǔ)專業(yè)寫作課堂中的實(shí)踐和探索[D];首都師范大學(xué);2007年
4 關(guān)瑩;新課程背景下小學(xué)英語(yǔ)課堂教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2007年
5 梅佐環(huán);形成性評(píng)價(jià)在高中數(shù)學(xué)教學(xué)中的應(yīng)用[D];華中師范大學(xué);2006年
,本文編號(hào):2268446
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/jiaoyulunwen/xiaoxuejiaoyu/2268446.html