發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-24 00:20

  本文選題：邢國(guó) + 燕國(guó)��； 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)對(duì)區(qū)域歷史文化的研究蓬勃發(fā)展,對(duì)地域史及諸侯國(guó)歷史的研究成為探尋中華民族發(fā)展歷史的必要途徑。而對(duì)先秦地區(qū)的歷史文化研究又是我國(guó)區(qū)域歷史文化研究的基礎(chǔ)部分。從歷史發(fā)展進(jìn)程來(lái)看,邢、燕兩國(guó)是西周時(shí)期分封的兩大侯國(guó),立國(guó)時(shí)間接近,又同在今京津冀地域范圍之內(nèi),從大的文化背景來(lái)看,應(yīng)該同屬于周文化系統(tǒng),但是,它們之間所顯現(xiàn)的差異性仍然值得我們關(guān)注。本文是以西周時(shí)期邢、燕兩國(guó)所處的地理人文環(huán)境為切入點(diǎn),從現(xiàn)有考古發(fā)掘遺存等資料出發(fā),結(jié)合已有的關(guān)于邢、燕兩國(guó)的都城遺址、居住址、出土器物等研究,對(duì)西周時(shí)期邢、燕文化遺存進(jìn)行全面梳理,對(duì)它們之間的相似性進(jìn)行剖析,并在此基礎(chǔ)上比較兩者之間的差異性,以從整體出發(fā),把握二者文化面貌的異同。論文主要分為以下六個(gè)部分:緒論�；仡櫧�現(xiàn)代有關(guān)西周時(shí)期邢、燕文化的相關(guān)研究,提出選題意義,并建立研究框架。第一章:環(huán)境是一個(gè)地域或國(guó)家生存發(fā)展的根基。本章對(duì)西周時(shí)期邢、燕所處的地理環(huán)境和人文環(huán)境進(jìn)行整體論述,針對(duì)其所處環(huán)境的特點(diǎn),從空間維度把握邢、燕文化形成的背景,為研究架設(shè)空間框架。第二章:以西周時(shí)期邢、燕都城遺址為切入點(diǎn),從都城的布局及防御設(shè)施等方面探析西周時(shí)期邢、燕兩國(guó)在都城營(yíng)建中體現(xiàn)的文化差異。第三章:從墓葬規(guī)模、形制、葬俗、隨葬品等方面闡述了西周時(shí)期邢、燕墓葬文化的不同,并對(duì)這些遺存中所含文化要素的緣由做了初步剖析。第四章:器物所折射出的內(nèi)涵組成了文化的主體,對(duì)西周時(shí)期邢、燕兩國(guó)出土典型器物包括陶器、青銅器進(jìn)行比較,是深入了解兩國(guó)文化差別的基本途徑。結(jié)語(yǔ)。簡(jiǎn)明扼要?dú)w納本文的觀點(diǎn),并提出本文存在的不足和以后研究中值得繼續(xù)鉆研的問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the research on regional history and culture has developed vigorously, and the study of regional history and the history of various countries has become a necessary way to explore the history of the development of the Chinese nation. And the historical and cultural study of the pre-Qin region is the basic part of the study of regional history and culture in China. Judging from the historical development process, Xing and Yan were the two great emperors in the Western Zhou Dynasty. The founding time of the state was close, and it was also within the scope of the present Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. From the point of view of the large cultural background, the two countries should belong to the Zhou culture system, but, The differences between them still deserve our attention. This article is based on the geographical and cultural environment of Xing and Yan in the Western Zhou Dynasty, starting from the existing archaeological excavations and other materials, combining the existing research on the capital ruins, residence sites and unearthed artifacts of Xing and Yan countries. This paper comprehensively combs the cultural relics of Xing and Yan in the Western Zhou Dynasty, analyzes their similarities and differences, and compares the differences between them on this basis, in order to grasp the similarities and differences of the two cultural features from the overall point of view. The thesis is divided into the following six parts: introduction. This paper reviews the relevant studies on the culture of Xing and Yan in the Western Zhou Dynasty, puts forward the significance of selecting the topic, and establishes the research framework. Chapter one: the environment is the foundation of the survival and development of a region or a country. In this chapter, the geographical environment and human environment of Xing and Yan in the Western Zhou Dynasty are discussed as a whole. According to the characteristics of the environment in which they are located, the background of the formation of Xing and Yan culture is grasped from the space dimension to set up a spatial framework for the study. The second chapter analyzes the cultural differences between Xing and Yan in the construction of the capital during the Western Zhou Dynasty from the layout and defense facilities of the capital. The third chapter expounds the different culture of Xing and Yan in the Western Zhou Dynasty from the aspects of burial scale, shape, burial customs and funeral articles, and makes a preliminary analysis of the reasons of the cultural elements contained in these remains. Chapter four: the connotation reflected by the objects constitutes the main body of culture. Comparing the typical artifacts unearthed in Xing and Yan countries in the Western Zhou Dynasty, including pottery and bronze ware, is the basic way to deeply understand the cultural differences between the two countries. Conclusion This paper briefly summarizes the views of this paper, and points out the shortcomings of this paper and the problems worth further study in the future research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：K878

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李學(xué)勤;《遙望星宿:甘肅考古文化叢書》總序[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年01期

2 達(dá)·海馨;高原考古文化悠然崛起——迎來(lái)人類發(fā)祥之源的發(fā)現(xiàn)時(shí)代[J];西藏藝術(shù)研究;1994年01期

3 魯岱青;草原考古文化研究的重要成果──評(píng)《絲綢之路草原石人研究》[J];西域研究;1996年02期

4 馬建軍,石磊;固原新石器考古文化的發(fā)現(xiàn)與研究[J];固原師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

5 趙振才;;通古斯-滿語(yǔ)與文化(三)[J];滿語(yǔ)研究;1987年01期

6 鷗盟;;《鎮(zhèn)江營(yíng)與塔照──拒馬河流域先秦考古文化的類型與譜系》簡(jiǎn)介[J];考古;1999年12期

7 覃德清;從多元起源到一體結(jié)構(gòu)的演進(jìn)律則——兼論中華民族凝聚力的考古文化淵源[J];東南文化;1993年01期

8 張川;論新疆史前考古文化的發(fā)展階段[J];西域研究;1997年03期

9 俞偉超;四川地區(qū)考古文化問(wèn)題思考[J];四川文物;2004年02期

10 孫連慶;;有關(guān)瓦希水路的部分考古文化特征分析[J];西伯利亞研究;2007年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 祝一志;楊亞長(zhǎng);程鵬;余華貴;康志海;;中國(guó)丹江上游地區(qū)環(huán)境變遷與考古文化更替[A];第七屆海峽兩岸氣膠技術(shù)研討會(huì)暨第二屆空氣污染技術(shù)研討會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2010年

2 ;編后記[A];內(nèi)蒙古中南部原始文化研究文集[C];1989年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前7條

1 朝陽(yáng)師專 雷廣臻;中華文明在不同區(qū)域起源的文化同一性[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 記者 駱展勝;桂林積極打造國(guó)家考古文化名城[N];廣西日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

3 王大方;自治區(qū)文物界：學(xué)十七大精神已落實(shí)四項(xiàng)工作[N];內(nèi)蒙古日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2007年

4 楊勇;西漢南越考古文化國(guó)際學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)召開[N];中國(guó)文物報(bào);2008年

5 記者 李靜;已查明600余處文物點(diǎn)文物藏品13268件[N];東營(yíng)日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

6 劉學(xué)堂;新疆地區(qū)史前考古文化基本結(jié)構(gòu)新識(shí)[N];中國(guó)文物報(bào);2002年

7 記者沈路濤;中華文明新紀(jì)錄電影周在京舉行[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳國(guó)慶;遼西地區(qū)新石器時(shí)代考古文化的形成與發(fā)展[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張櫻爍;西周時(shí)期邢、燕考古文化的比較研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2017年

2 努爾古麗;從考古文化看新疆突厥語(yǔ)族各民族薩滿教信仰[D];中央民族大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2059110